Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33705410›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Effects of a blend of essential oils in milk replacer on performance, rumen fermentation, blood parameters, and health scores of dairy heifers.

Joana Palhares Campolina, Sandra Gesteira Coelho, Anna Luiza Belli, Fernanda Samarini Machado, Luiz Gustavo R Pereira, Thierry R Tomich, Wanessa A Carvalho, Rodrigo Otávio S Silva, Alessandra L Voorsluys, David V Jacob and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Effect ofFood science & nutrition · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joana Palhares CampolinaDepartment of Animal Science, Veterinary School, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7081-382X
Sandra Gesteira CoelhoDepartment of Animal Science, Veterinary School, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Anna Luiza BelliDepartment of Animal Science, Veterinary School, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Fernanda Samarini MachadoBrazilian Agricultural Research Corporation-EMBRAPA, National Center for Research on Dairy Cattle, Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Luiz Gustavo R PereiraBrazilian Agricultural Research Corporation-EMBRAPA, National Center for Research on Dairy Cattle, Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Thierry R TomichBrazilian Agricultural Research Corporation-EMBRAPA, National Center for Research on Dairy Cattle, Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Wanessa A CarvalhoBrazilian Agricultural Research Corporation-EMBRAPA, National Center for Research on Dairy Cattle, Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1346-5240
Rodrigo Otávio S SilvaDepartment of Veterinary Science, Veterinary School, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Alessandra L VoorsluysAdisseo, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
David V JacobAdisseo, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Mariana Magalhães CamposBrazilian Agricultural Research Corporation-EMBRAPA, National Center for Research on Dairy Cattle, Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation · BRUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate how the inclusion of a blend of essential oils in milk replacer (MR) affects different outcomes of dairy heifers. The outcomes evaluated: feed intake, performance, body development, blood cells and metabolites, insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), rumen fermentation, fecal scores, and respiratory scores. All outcomes were evaluated during pre-weaning (4-60 d of age), and carry-over effects during post-weaning (61-90 d of age) periods. The experimental units utilized were 29 newborn Holstein × Gyr crossbred dairy heifers, with genetic composition of 5/8 or more Holstein and 3/8 or less Gyr and body weight (BW) at birth of 32.2 ± 5.2 kg. Experimental units were assigned to either a control (CON, n = 15) or a blend of essential oil supplementation (BEO, n = 14) treatment, maintaining a balance of genetic composition. The BEO was supplemented in the MR with 1 g/d/calf of a blend of essential oils (Apex Calf, Adisseo, China) composed by plant extracts derived from anise, cinnamon, garlic, rosemary, and thyme. During the pre-weaning phase, all heifers were fed 5 L of MR/d reconstituted to 15% (dry matter basis), divided into two equal meals. Water and starter were provided ad libitum. During the post-weaning, animals received a maximum of 3 kg of starter/d, and ad libitum corn silage, divided into two meals. Feed intake, fecal and respiratory scores were evaluated daily. The BW was measured every three days, while body development was recorded weekly. Blood samples were collected on 0, 30, and 60 d of age for total blood cell count, weekly and on the weaning day to determinate ß-hydroxybutyrate, urea and glucose, and biweekly for IGF-1. Ruminal parameters (pH, volatile fatty acids, ammonia-N, and acetate:propionate proportion-C2:C3) were measured on days 14, 28, 42, 60, 74 and 90. A randomized complete block design with an interaction between treatment and week was the experimental method of choice to test the hypothesis of the BEO's effect on all outcomes. An ANOVA procedure was used for continuous outcomes, and a non-parametric test was used for the ordered categorical outcomes, both adopting a CI = 95%. Results indicated that there was not enough evidence to accept the alternative hypothesis of the effect of BEO in MR on feed intake, performance, body development, and blood metabolites during both pre-weaning and post-weaning periods. However, results indicated that the inclusion of BEO in MR significantly affects the proportion of C2:C3 during pre- and post-weaning (P = 0.05). Similarly, the effect was significant for basophil (P ≤ 0.001), and platelet (P = 0.04) counts pre-weaning. The interaction between week and treatment was also significant for lymphocytes (P ≤ 0.001), revealing a cumulative effect. Lastly, fecal scores were also significant (P = 0.04) during pre-weaning, with lower values for BEO. The BEO contributed to ruminal manipulation in pre-weaning and carry-over effects in post-weaning, immunity improvement, and decreased morbidity of neonatal diarrhea in the pre-weaning phase.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, NewbornBlood Cell CountBlood CellsBody WeightCattleDietDietary SupplementsFatty Acids, VolatileFemaleHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationInsulin-Like Growth Factor INitrogenOils, VolatileRumenFatty Acids, VolatileInsulin-Like Growth Factor INitrogenOils, Volatile

Identifiers

PMID33705410
PMCPMC7951862
OpenAlexW3135076102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.