ArticlePLoS medicine2021
Human papillomavirus vaccination for adults aged 30 to 45 years in the United States: A cost-effectiveness analysis.
Article in PLoS medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cost-effectiveness modeling for gender-neutral human papillomavirus vaccines: A systematic literature review.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Pooled it
- A systematic review of microsimulation models for skin cancer.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Pooled it
- HPV vaccination among seropositive, DNA negative cohorts: a systematic review & meta-analysis.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Estimated HPV-Attributable Inpatient Pharmaceutical Reimbursement in Bulgaria, 2021-2025: A National Payer-Perspective Expenditure Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Adapting Sexual Behavior Survey Data to Parameterize an Agent-Based Model of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Transmission.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2026Article
- Optimal cervical cancer screening strategies for unvaccinated and HPV-vaccinated cohorts in the United States: a comprehensive comparative modeling analysis.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2026Article
- Cost-effectiveness and health impact of gender-neutral and single-dose HPV vaccination in Hong Kong: a modeling analysis.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2026Article
- Single-dose HPV vaccination in the United States - a multi-modeling analysis.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2026Article
- The human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccination recommendations and funded programs for adults: A targeted literature review.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Review
- Inequalities in HPV vaccine offer among Italian regions: Analysis of regional prevention plans.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- State-level disparities in cervical cancer prevention and outcomes in the United States: a modeling study.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2025Article
- Improving HPV Vaccine Coverage in Tennessee: Addressing Barriers and Expanding Access for Mid-Adults.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- State-level disparities in cervical cancer prevention and outcomes in the U.S.: A modeling study.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Incremental net benefit of extending human papillomavirus vaccine to boys in oropharyngeal cancer burden: Meta-analysis of cost-effectiveness studies.Journal of dental sciences · 2024Article
- Looking Back, Moving Forward: Challenges and Opportunities for Global Cervical Cancer Prevention and Control.Viruses · 2024Review
- Article
- HPVsim: An agent-based model of HPV transmission and cervical disease.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Linkage of individual-patient data confirm protection of prophylactic human papillomavirus vaccination against invasive cervical cancer.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA nonavalent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine has been licensed for use in women and men up to age 45 years in the United States. The cost-effectiveness of HPV vaccination for women and men aged 30 to 45 years in the context of cervical cancer screening practice was evaluated to inform national guidelines. METHODS AND
findingsWe utilized 2 independent HPV microsimulation models to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of extending the upper age limit of HPV vaccination in women (from age 26 years) and men (from age 21 years) up to age 30, 35, 40, or 45 years. The models were empirically calibrated to reflect the burden of HPV and related cancers in the US population and used standardized inputs regarding historical and future vaccination uptake, vaccine efficacy, cervical cancer screening, and costs. Disease outcomes included cervical, anal, oropharyngeal, vulvar, vaginal, and penile cancers, as well as genital warts. Both models projected higher costs and greater health benefits as the upper age limit of HPV vaccination increased. Strategies of vaccinating females and males up to ages 30, 35, and 40 years were found to be less cost-effective than vaccinating up to age 45 years, which had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) greater than a commonly accepted upper threshold of $200,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. When including all HPV-related outcomes, the ICER for vaccinating up to age 45 years ranged from $315,700 to $440,600 per QALY gained. Assumptions regarding cervical screening compliance, vaccine costs, and the natural history of noncervical HPV-related cancers had major impacts on the cost-effectiveness of the vaccination strategies. Key limitations of the study were related to uncertainties in the data used to inform the models, including the timing of vaccine impact on noncervical cancers and vaccine efficacy at older ages.
conclusionsOur results from 2 independent models suggest that HPV vaccination for adult women and men aged 30 to 45 years is unlikely to represent good value for money in the US.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.