Clinical utility during inpatient rehabilitation of a clinical prediction rule for ambulation prognosis following spinal cord injury.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Rethinking Movement: From Capacity to Context.Kinesiology review (Champaign, Ill.) · 2026
   Article
2. A Single Dermatome Clinical Prediction Rule for Independent Walking 1 Year After Spinal Cord Injury.Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2024
   Article
3. Are Clinical Prediction Rules Used in Spinal Cord Injury Care? A Survey of Practice.Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation · 2024
   Article
4. Toward Improving the Prediction of Functional Ambulation After Spinal Cord Injury Through the Inclusion of Limb Accelerations During Sleep and Personal Factors.Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2022
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as