Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33704917›Full record

ReviewThoracic cancer2021

Mutation profile and immunoscore signature in thymic carcinomas: An exploratory study and review of the literature.

Rosanna Asselta, Luca Di Tommaso, Matteo Perrino, Annarita Destro, Laura Giordano, Giulia Cardamone, Luca Rubino, Armando Santoro, Stefano Duga, Paolo Andrea Zucali

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Thoracic cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Thymic Carcinomas-A Concise Multidisciplinary Update on Recent Developments From the Thymic Carcinoma Working Group of the International Thymic Malignancy Interest Group.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rosanna Asselta *Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.
Luca Di Tommaso *Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.
Matteo PerrinoDepartment of Oncology, IRCCS, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy.
Annarita DestroUnit of Pathology, IRCCS, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy.
Laura GiordanoStatistic Unit, IRCCS, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy.
Giulia CardamoneDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.
Luca RubinoDepartment of Oncology, IRCCS, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy.
Armando SantoroDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1709-9492
Stefano Duga *Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.
Paolo Andrea Zucali *Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.
Humanitas University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSignificant efforts have been made to investigate the molecular pathways involved in thymic carcinogenesis. However, genetic findings have still not impacted clinical practice. The aim of this exploratory trial was to evaluate the immunoscore and molecular profile of a series of thymic carcinomas (TCs), correlating this data with clinical outcome.

methodsFormalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) TC tissues were retrieved from our center archive. The immunoscore was evaluated according to Angell and Gallon. DNA was extracted from FFPE tumor samples and, when available, from adjacent histologically normal tissues. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed targeting hotspot regions of 50 oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes.

resultsA series of 15 TCs were analyzed. After a median follow-up of 82.4 months, the median overall survival was 104.7 months. The immunoscore was >2 in 5/15 patients (33%). Among the investigated genes, absence of mutations was observed in 5/15 patients (33%), whereas three variants in 1/15 (6%) patient, two variants in 4/15 (26%) patients, and one variant in 5/15 patients (33%) were found. The most recurrently mutated genes were FGFR3 (five mutations) and CDKN2A (three mutations, two of which were nonsense). Patients with CDKN2A loss showed a statistically significantly worse survival (P = 0.0013), whereas patients with FGFR3 mutations showed a statistically significantly better survival (P = 0.048).

conclusionsThis study adds data to the few existing reports on the mutational landscape of TCs, providing the first comprehensive analysis to date. Here, we confirm the low rate of mutations in TCs and suggest FGFR3 and CDKN2A mutations as intriguing potential therapeutic targets.

Indexed as

AdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutationThymus NeoplasmsGermline mutationimmunoscorenext-generation sequencingsomatic mutationthymic carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID33704917
PMCPMC8088947
OpenAlexW3135215640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.