ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2021
Cardiac Rehab in the COVID Era and Beyond: mHealth and Other Novel Opportunities.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- COVID-19 Mobile Health Apps: An Overview of Mobile Applications in Indonesia.Frontiers in public health · 2022Pooled it
- Integrating Artificial Intelligence Into Digital Health-Optimized Therapeutics for the Remote Cardiac Rehabilitation.Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology · 2026Review
- Article
- The Accessibility and Effect of Cardiac Rehabilitation in COVID-19 Pandemic Era.Annals of rehabilitation medicine · 2024Article
- "A Friendly Conversation." Developing an eHealth Intervention to Increase COVID-19 Testing and Vaccination Literacy Among Women with Criminal and Legal System Involvement.Journal of health communication · 2024Article
- A New Player in the Game: Can Exergame Be of Support in the Management of Atrial Fibrillation?Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- Efficacy and Adherence Rates of a Novel Community-Informed Virtual World-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program: Protocol for theJournal of the American Heart Association · 2023Article
- Health Care Implications of the COVID-19 Pandemic for the Cardiovascular Practitioner.The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2023Review
- National, regional, and urban-rural patterns in fixed-terrestrial broadband internet access and cardiac rehabilitation utilization in the United States.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2023Article
- A survey of digital access, digital confidence and rehabilitation delivery preferences of patients referred for CR.The British journal of cardiology · 2023Article
- Feasibility of the 30 s Sit-to-Stand Test in the Telehealth Setting and Its Relationship to Persistent Symptoms in Non-Hospitalized Patients with Long COVID.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Article
- Strengthening the Trialability for the Intention to Use of mHealth Apps Amidst Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Current role and future perspectives of cardiac rehabilitation in coronary heart disease.World journal of cardiology · 2021Review
- COVID-19 and Cardiovascular Disease: a Global Perspective.Current cardiology reports · 2021Review
- The Future of Exercise-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation for Patients With Heart Failure.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Review
- Effect of Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program on Self-Efficacy of Patients With Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator.SAGE open nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewThe COVID-19 pandemic has forced many center-based cardiac rehabilitation (CBCR) programs to close or limit their usual offerings. In order for patients to continue to benefit from CR, programs need to rapidly adapt to the current environment. This review highlights ways CR has evolved, and reviews the history of CR and recent advancements in telemedicine including remote patient monitoring, and mobile health that can be applied to CR. RECENT
findingsDespite that initial studies indicate that home-based CR (HBCR) is safe and effective, HBCR has faced several challenges that have prevented it from becoming more widely implemented. Many previous concerns can now be addressed through the use of new innovations in home-based healthcare delivery. Since its inception, CR has become increasingly recognized as an important tool to improve patient mortality and quality of life in a broad range of cardiac diseases. While there has been little need to modify the delivery of CR since the 1950s, COVID-19 now serves as the necessary impetus to make HBCR an equal alternative to CBCR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.