Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33704603›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular neurobiology2021

Synthesis of the Mechanisms of Opioid Tolerance: Do We Still Say NO?

Laura J Gledhill, Anna-Marie Babey

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular neurobiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Benefits ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Opioid system and related ligands: from the past to future perspectives.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laura J GledhillCURA Pharmacy, St. John of God Hospital, Bendigo, VIC, 3550, Australia.
Anna-Marie BabeyFaculty of Medicine and Health, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, 2351, Australia. ababey@une.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3454-5204
St John of God Hospital · AUUniversity of New England · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of morphine as a first-line agent for moderate-to-severe pain is limited by the development of analgesic tolerance. Initially opioid receptor desensitization in response to repeated stimulation, thought to underpin the establishment of tolerance, was linked to a compensatory increase in adenylate cyclase responsiveness. The subsequent demonstration of cross-talk between N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) glutamate receptors and opioid receptors led to the recognition of a role for nitric oxide (NO), wherein blockade of NO synthesis could prevent tolerance developing. Investigations of the link between NO levels and opioid receptor desensitization implicated a number of events including kinase recruitment and peroxynitrite-mediated protein regulation. Recent experimental advances and the identification of new cellular constituents have expanded the potential signaling candidates to include unexpected, intermediary compounds not previously linked to this process such as zinc, histidine triad nucleotide-binding protein 1 (HINT1), micro-ribonucleic acid (mi-RNA) and regulator of G protein signaling Z (RGSZ). A further complication is a lack of consistency in the protocols used to create tolerance, with some using acute methods measured in minutes to hours and others using days. There is also an emphasis on the cellular changes that are extant only after tolerance has been established. Although a review of the literature demonstrates a lack of spatio-temporal detail, there still appears to be a pivotal role for nitric oxide, as well as both intracellular and intercellular cross-talk. The use of more consistent approaches to verify these underlying mechanism(s) could provide an avenue for targeted drug development to rescue opioid efficacy.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidAnimalsDrug ToleranceHumansMorphineNitric OxideOpioid-Related DisordersPainReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateAnalgesics, OpioidMorphineNitric OxideReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateAnalgesic toleranceCross-talkMorphineNMDA glutamate receptorsμ opioid receptors

Identifiers

PMID33704603
PMCPMC11448615
OpenAlexW3135114959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.