Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33704566›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2021

A comparison of the MNA-SF, MUST, and NRS-2002 nutritional tools in predicting treatment incompletion of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer.

Shun-Wen Hsueh, Cheng-Chou Lai, Chia-Yen Hung, Yu-Ching Lin, Chang-Hsien Lu, Kun-Yun Yeh, Ngan-Ming Tsang, Yu-Shin Hung, Pei-Hung Chang, Wen-Chi Chou

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Landscape analysis of oncology nutrition research among patients being treated for cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Frailty is an independent factor for health-related quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer receiving definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  7. Effect of prophylactic tube feeding in head and neck cancer patients with high Mallampati score undergoing definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A comparison of three preoperative nutritional assessment methods for predicting ovarian cancer patient prognosis: which is better?Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Shun-Wen HsuehDepartment of Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Keelung, Keelung, Taiwan.
Cheng-Chou LaiDepartment of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Chia-Yen HungDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Yu-Ching LinDepartment of Medical Imaging and Intervention, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Keelung, Keelung, Taiwan.
Chang-Hsien LuDepartment of Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Chiayi, Chiayi, Taiwan.
Kun-Yun YehDepartment of Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Keelung, Keelung, Taiwan.
Ngan-Ming TsangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Yu-Shin HungDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Pei-Hung ChangDepartment of Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Keelung, Keelung, Taiwan.
Wen-Chi ChouDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan. wenchi3992@yahoo.com.tw.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0361-4548
Chang Gung University · TWKeelung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWChang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWChiayi Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConcurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) treatment incompletion is a known negative prognosticator for patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). Malnutrition is a common phenomenon which leads to treatment interruption in patients with HNC. We aimed to compare the performance of three nutritional tools in predicting treatment incompletion in patients with HNC undergoing definitive CCRT. MATERIAL AND

methodsThree nutritional assessment tools, Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form (MNA-SF), Malnutritional Universal Screening Tool (MUST), and Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002), were prospectively assessed prior to CCRT for HNC patients. Patients were stratified into either normal nutrition or malnourished groups using different nutrition tools. Treatment incompletion and treatment-related toxicities associated with CCRT were recorded.

resultsA total of 461 patients were included in the study; malnourished rates ranged from 31.0 to 51.0%. The CCRT incompletion rates were 4.9-6.3% and 14.5-18.2% for normal nutrition patients and malnourished patients, respectively. The tools had significant correlations with each other (Pearson correlation 0.801-0.837, p<0.001 for all) and accurately predicted the incompletion of CCRT. MNA-SF had the highest performance in predicting treatment-related toxicity, including emergency room visits, need for hospitalization, any grade III or higher hematological adverse events, and critical body weight loss, compared to the other tools.

conclusionsMNA-SF, MUST, and NRS2002 were all shown to be competent tools for prediction of treatment incompletion and treatment-related toxicity in HNC patients undergoing CCRT. We suggest implementing nutritional assessment prior to treatment to improve the rate of treatment completion and to reduce treatment-related toxicity in HNC patients.

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsMalnutritionAgedChemoradiotherapyGeriatric AssessmentHumansNutritional StatusNutrition AssessmentAdverse eventHead and neck cancerNutritional assessment toolTreatment incompletion

Identifiers

PMID33704566
OpenAlexW3135064640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.