Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33704565›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2021

Development and validation of a nomogram to predict the risk of breast cancer-related lymphedema among Chinese breast cancer survivors.

Yan-Fei Liu, Jun-E Liu, Yi Zhu, Yim Wah Mak, Hui Qiu, Li-Hui Liu, Shen-Shen Yang, Shao-Hua Chen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects of resistance training on breast cancer-related arm lymphedema: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Yan-Fei LiuSchool of Nursing, Capital Medical University, No. 10, Xitoutiao, You An Men Wai, Feng-Tai District, Beijing, China.
Jun-E LiuSchool of Nursing, Capital Medical University, No. 10, Xitoutiao, You An Men Wai, Feng-Tai District, Beijing, China. liujune66@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6843-9322
Yi ZhuHospice Palliative Care Alliance of China Foundation, 3200 Ridge Pike, P. O. Box 436, Eagleville, PA, 19403, USA.
Yim Wah MakSchool of Nursing, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Yuk Choi Road, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China. yw.mak@polyu.edu.hk.
Hui QiuSchool of Nursing, Capital Medical University, No. 10, Xitoutiao, You An Men Wai, Feng-Tai District, Beijing, China.
Li-Hui LiuBeijing Shijitan Hospital affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Shen-Shen YangSchool of Nursing, Capital Medical University, No. 10, Xitoutiao, You An Men Wai, Feng-Tai District, Beijing, China.
Shao-Hua ChenSchool of Nursing, Capital Medical University, No. 10, Xitoutiao, You An Men Wai, Feng-Tai District, Beijing, China.
Capital Medical University · CNHong Kong Polytechnic University · HKHospice Palliative Care Alliance of China Foundation · US

Funding

Beijing Natural Science Foundation 7182015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBreast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a major long-term complication for post-surgery breast cancer survivors. Although several risk factors have been identified, lifestyle characteristics have been neglected in previous studies. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a nomogram for estimating this population's risk of developing lymphedema, taking into consideration their demographic, clinical, and personal lifestyle behaviors.

methodsIn a cross-sectional study, we collected data from 775 post-operative breast cancer survivors who had attended a follow-up session in the recent 10 years (primary cohort). Lymphedema was assessed using the Norman telephone questionnaire, self-reported by patients. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for lymphedema, including demographic, clinical, and lifestyle-related factors. A nomogram was constructed based on those factors and was validated using a separate group of 314 breast cancer patients (validation cohort).

resultsThe factors independently associated with lymphedema were higher body mass index (BMI), modified radical mastectomy (MRM), postsurgical infection, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, exercise of the affected arm, and the active participation in physical activity (P<0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) values of the primary and the validation cohorts were 0.721 (95% confidence interval: 0.685-0.756) and 0.702 (95% confidence interval: 0.646-0.759), respectively.

conclusionsBCRL risk factors include MRM, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and higher BMI, while the active physical activity behavior of patients appears to be a factor against lymphedema. The nomogram incorporating the patients' clinical and lifestyle factors might be useful for predicting lymphedema in breast cancer survivors.

Indexed as

Breast Cancer LymphedemaBreast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsLymphedemaChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMastectomyNomogramsBreast cancerLifestyle behaviorsLymphedemaNomogramRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID33704565
OpenAlexW3135755664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.