Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33704563›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2021

A multicentric study of pharmacological treatment for presbyopia.

Giovanna Benozzi, Martín Eugenio Cortina, Esteban Gimeno, Darío Lucio Vantesone, Antonio Enrique Solas, Gonzalo Matías Lorda, Sonia Facal, Juliana Leiro, Betina Orman

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Pharmacological Treatment in Presbyopia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Giovanna BenozziCentro de Investigación Avanzada para la Presbicia, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Martín Eugenio CortinaInstituto Oftalmológico Cortina, Santa Rosa, La Pampa, Argentina.
Esteban GimenoClínica de Ojos del Sud, Bahía Blanca, Argentina.
Darío Lucio VantesoneClínica Cimed, Puerto Iguazú, Misiones, Argentina.
Antonio Enrique SolasClínica de Ojos Visión Médica, Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Gonzalo Matías LordaInstituto Oftalmológico Cortina, Santa Rosa, La Pampa, Argentina.
Sonia FacalCentro de Investigación Avanzada para la Presbicia, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Juliana LeiroCentro de Investigación Avanzada para la Presbicia, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Betina OrmanUniversidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Odontología, Cátedra de Farmacología, Buenos Aires, Argentina. betina.orman@odontologia.uba.ar.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4584-4739
Universidad de Buenos Aires · ARCentro Científico Tecnológico - Bahía Blanca · ARInstituto de Biología Subtropical · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the safety, efficacy, and patient satisfaction with a pharmacological treatment of presbyopia performed with the Benozzi's method.

methodsA non-randomized multicentric case-series retrospective study was developed. Were included patients from 5 centers of Argentina, from January 2010 to June 2019, aged at baseline between 40 and 60 years old, with binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) of 25/20 or better, and with uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) at least Jaeger (J) 2 or worse. The treatment was performed with a patented formulation (pilocarpine and diclofenac preservative-free eye drops). The main outcome was binocular UNVA and UDVA. Differences were evaluated by paired t-test. The presence of side effects and patient's satisfaction were also evaluated. Data was analyzed in separated groups according to their follow-up time, from 2 to 10 years.

resultsA total of 148 patients were included. At baseline, the UNVA for the different groups were between J3 and J8 which was improved to J1 to J2. The mean baseline UDVA has been ranged between 0.02 and 0.04 logMAR. The mean baseline UDVA has been ranged between 0.02 to 0.04 logMAR, after treatment were between 0.01 to 0.03, without a statisticallysignificant improvement. Side effects were spontaneously resolved, and subjective evaluation shows that patients were satisfied.

conclusionsThis first multicentric shows that Benozzi's method for presbyopia treatment was safety and improves the UNVA without affecting the UDVA, maintaining their efficacy even after 10 years, in a population aged between 40 and 60 years old, from different ophthalmic centers in Argentina.

Indexed as

PresbyopiaAdultHumansMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionRefraction, OcularRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeVision, BinocularVisual AcuityMulticentric studyPharmacological treatment of presbyopiaPresbyopiaVisual acuity

Identifiers

PMID33704563
OpenAlexW3133684233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.