ReviewNeuroradiology2021
Neuroimaging safety during pregnancy and lactation: a review.
Review in Neuroradiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of Acute Appendicitis in Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review of Current Evidence.Cureus · 2026Review
- Traumatic brain injury in obstetric patients: challenges and management strategiesRevista colombiana de obstetricia y ginecologia · 2025Review
- Preoperative prediction of diffuse glioma type and grade in adults: a gadolinium-free MRI-based decision tree.European radiology · 2025Article
- The risk profiles of pregnancy-related cerebral venous thrombosis: a retrospective study in a comprehensive hospital.BMC neurology · 2024Article
- Use of gadolinium-based contrast agents in multiple sclerosis: a review by the ESMRMB-GREC and ESNR Multiple Sclerosis Working Group.European radiology · 2024Review
- Imaging Outcomes of Emergency MRI in Patients with Suspected Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Medulloblastoma Presenting as Severe Headache during Pregnancy: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeImaging studies are crucial adjuncts when studying acute and chronic diseases, so pregnant and lactating women are as likely to be evaluated with one of the available imaging modalities. Due to the specific condition of the mother and child in this time period it is crucial to make an appropriate selection of imaging studies.
methodsWe review the existing literature and analyse the latest evidence and guidelines regarding neuroimaging safety during pregnancy and lactation, proposing an algorithm of action based on risk/benefits assessment.
resultsChoosing the most appropriate neuroimaging modality implicates assessing the pretest pertinence of the study-the possibility of a serious treatable neurologic disease, pondering what is the most useful imaging modality for the diagnosis and evaluating the associated risks. Among physicians (and patients), however, the risk component is perhaps the least well understood, with misperceptions regarding safety and potential hazards. Computed tomography (CT) risks are principally related to ionizing radiation and intravenous (IV) administration of iodinated contrast. However, as very low risks for the mother and foetus have been reported and CT remains the most available tool for initial rapid diagnosis of acute neurological conditions, it should not be withheld in urgent situations. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), unlike CT, does not use ionizing radiation or iodinated contrast mediums, having the best anatomical detail possible. However, there are some usage safety concerns regarding the magnetic field strength and gadolinium-based contrast use.
conclusionThere are lacking longitudinal and prospective studies to sustain evidence based choices of imaging studies during pregnancy and lactation. Ultimately the decision should be based on the risk/benefit, taking into account the patient's safety, care and outcomes. However, using a specific algorithm can guide decisions in daily clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33704518What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.