Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33704378›Full record

Trial reportJAMA oncology2021

Safety and Efficacy of Virtual Prostatectomy With Single-Dose Radiotherapy in Patients With Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: Results From the PROSINT Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Carlo Greco, Oriol Pares, Nuno Pimentel, Vasco Louro, Inês Santiago, Sandra Vieira, Joep Stroom, Dalila Mateus, Ana Soares, João Marques and 5 more

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02570919 nacompletednot on this map

Phase II Randomized Study Comparing Ultra-high-dose Hypofractionated vs. Single-dose Image-Guided Radiotherapy (IGRT) With Urethral Sparing for Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorFundacao ChampalimaudRan2015 to 2017Enrolled30ConditionsPROSTATE CANCERArmsIGRT 45 Gy in 5 fractions of 9 Gy, IGRT 24 Gy single dose
NCT05936736 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

24 Gy in One Fraction Urethral-sparing "High-Dose-Rate Like" Stereotactic Body RadioTherapy for Prostate Cancer: a Single-center Non-randomized Prospective Clinical Study (PRO-FAST)

TypeinterventionalSponsorIRCCS San RaffaeleRan2023 to 2030Enrolled70ConditionsLocalized Prostate CarcinomaArmsprostate SBRT
NCT06027892 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Two-fraction Versus Five-fraction Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Localized Low- and Favorable Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer: SABR-Dual

TypeinterventionalSponsorRabin Medical CenterRan2022 to 2032Enrolled562ConditionsPROSTATE CANCERArmsTwo-fraction stereotactic radiotherapy, Five-fraction stereotactic radiotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy in one or two sessions for localized prostate cancer: a review of the evidence and future perspectives.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Carlo GrecoThe Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal.
Oriol ParesThe Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal.
Nuno PimentelThe Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal.
Vasco LouroThe Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal.
Inês SantiagoThe Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal.
Sandra VieiraThe Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal.
Joep StroomThe Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal.
Dalila MateusThe Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal.
Ana SoaresThe Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal.
João MarquesThe Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal.
Elda FreitasThe Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal.
Graça CoelhoThe Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal.
Manuela SeixasThe Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal.
Antonio Lopez-BeltranThe Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal.
Zvi FuksThe Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal.
Champalimaud Foundation · PT

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceUltra-high single-dose radiotherapy (SDRT) represents a potential alternative to curative extreme hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in organ-confined prostate cancer.

objectiveTo compare toxic effect profiles, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) responses, and quality-of-life end points of SDRT vs extreme hypofractionated SBRT. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsThe PROSINT single-institution phase 2 randomized clinical trial accrued, between September 2015 and January 2017, 30 participants with intermediate-risk prostate cancer to receive SDRT or extreme hypofractionated SBRT. Androgen deprivation therapy was not permitted. Data were analyzed from March to May 2020.

interventionsPatients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive 5 × 9 Gy SBRT (control arm) or 24 Gy SDRT (test arm). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was toxic effects; the secondary end points were PSA response, PSA relapse-free survival, and patient-reported quality of life measured with the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC)-26 questionnaires.

resultsA total of 30 men were randomized; median (interquartile range) age was 66.3 (61.2-69.9) and 73.6 (64.7-75.9) years for the SBRT and SDRT arms, respectively. Time to appearance and duration of acute and late toxic effects were similar in the 2 trial arms. Cumulative late actuarial urinary toxic effects did not differ for grade 1 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.41; 90% CI, 0.13-1.27) and grade 2 or greater (HR, 1.07; 90% CI, 0.21-5.57). Actuarial grade 1 late gastrointestinal (GI) toxic effects were comparable (HR, 0.37; 90% CI, 0.07-1.94) and there were no grade 2 or greater late GI toxic effects. Declines in PSA level to less than 0.5 ng/mL occurred by 36 months in both study arms. No PSA relapses occurred in favorable intermediate-risk disease, while in the unfavorable category, the actuarial 4-year PSA relapse-free survival values were 75.0% vs 64.0% (HR, 0.76; 90% CI, 0.17-3.31) for SBRT vs SDRT, respectively. The EPIC-26 median summary scores for the genitourinary and GI domains dropped transiently at 1 month and returned to pretreatment scores by 3 months in both arms. The IPSS-derived transient late urinary flare symptoms occurred at 9 to 18 months in 20% (90% CI, 3%-37%) of patients receiving SDRT. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this randomized clinical trial among patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer, SDRT was safe and associated with low toxicity, and the tumor control and quality-of-life end points closely match the SBRT arm outcomes. Further studies are encouraged to explore indications for SDRT in the cure of prostate cancer.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02570919.

Indexed as

ProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsRadiosurgeryHumansMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProstate-Specific AntigenQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID33704378
PMCPMC7953338
OpenAlexW3133698264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.