Trial reportJAMA oncology2021
Safety and Efficacy of Virtual Prostatectomy With Single-Dose Radiotherapy in Patients With Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: Results From the PROSINT Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase II Randomized Study Comparing Ultra-high-dose Hypofractionated vs. Single-dose Image-Guided Radiotherapy (IGRT) With Urethral Sparing for Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer
24 Gy in One Fraction Urethral-sparing "High-Dose-Rate Like" Stereotactic Body RadioTherapy for Prostate Cancer: a Single-center Non-randomized Prospective Clinical Study (PRO-FAST)
Two-fraction Versus Five-fraction Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Localized Low- and Favorable Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer: SABR-Dual
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.
- State of the art and future challenges of urethra-sparing stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a systematic review of literature.World journal of urology · 2023Pooled it
- Safety and efficacy associated with single-fraction high-dose-rate brachytherapy in localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2023Pooled it
- Comprehensive one-day management of prostate cancer patients: PRO-FAST single-fraction ablative, urethral-sparing, HDR-like, robotic SBRT.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Feasibility of Same-Day Prostate Fiducial Markers, Perirectal Hydrogel Spacer Placement, and Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Simulation for External Beam Radiation Therapy for Low-Risk and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer.Practical radiation oncologyTrial
- Article
- Ultrahypofractionation of localized prostate cancer-an updated statement of the prostate cancer working group of the German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO).Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026Review
- Association between dose to specific pelvic substructures and urinary and sexual dysfunction following Single-Dose ablative radiotherapy for prostate Cancer: A post hoc analysis from the ABRUPT trial.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy in one or two sessions for localized prostate cancer: a review of the evidence and future perspectives.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Review
- Homologous recombination repair gene alteration is strongly associated with more prostate-specific membrane antigen-positive metastases in newly diagnosed hormone-sensitive prostate cancer with ≤5 conventional imaging defined distant metastases.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- Tailoring prostate cancer external beam radiotherapy for patients with lower urinary tract symptoms.World journal of urology · 2025Review
- Single-Dose Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: Where Does the Evidence Lead?Cancers · 2025Review
- Image-guided treatment of mouse tumours with radioactive ion beams.Nature physics · 2025Article
- Proton Versus CyberKnife Therapy Planning for Hypofractionated Treatment of Prostate With Focal Boost.International journal of particle therapy · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- The march toward single-fraction stereotactic body radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer-Quo Vadimus?World journal of urology · 2023Review
- Stressed target cancer cells drive nongenetic reprogramming of CAR T cells and solid tumor microenvironment.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Novel unconventional radiotherapy techniques: Current status and future perspectives - Report from the 2nd international radiation oncology online seminar.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2023Article
- Reducing PTV margins for prostate SBRT with motion compensation and gating techniques.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
15 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
importanceUltra-high single-dose radiotherapy (SDRT) represents a potential alternative to curative extreme hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in organ-confined prostate cancer.
objectiveTo compare toxic effect profiles, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) responses, and quality-of-life end points of SDRT vs extreme hypofractionated SBRT. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsThe PROSINT single-institution phase 2 randomized clinical trial accrued, between September 2015 and January 2017, 30 participants with intermediate-risk prostate cancer to receive SDRT or extreme hypofractionated SBRT. Androgen deprivation therapy was not permitted. Data were analyzed from March to May 2020.
interventionsPatients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive 5 × 9 Gy SBRT (control arm) or 24 Gy SDRT (test arm). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was toxic effects; the secondary end points were PSA response, PSA relapse-free survival, and patient-reported quality of life measured with the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC)-26 questionnaires.
resultsA total of 30 men were randomized; median (interquartile range) age was 66.3 (61.2-69.9) and 73.6 (64.7-75.9) years for the SBRT and SDRT arms, respectively. Time to appearance and duration of acute and late toxic effects were similar in the 2 trial arms. Cumulative late actuarial urinary toxic effects did not differ for grade 1 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.41; 90% CI, 0.13-1.27) and grade 2 or greater (HR, 1.07; 90% CI, 0.21-5.57). Actuarial grade 1 late gastrointestinal (GI) toxic effects were comparable (HR, 0.37; 90% CI, 0.07-1.94) and there were no grade 2 or greater late GI toxic effects. Declines in PSA level to less than 0.5 ng/mL occurred by 36 months in both study arms. No PSA relapses occurred in favorable intermediate-risk disease, while in the unfavorable category, the actuarial 4-year PSA relapse-free survival values were 75.0% vs 64.0% (HR, 0.76; 90% CI, 0.17-3.31) for SBRT vs SDRT, respectively. The EPIC-26 median summary scores for the genitourinary and GI domains dropped transiently at 1 month and returned to pretreatment scores by 3 months in both arms. The IPSS-derived transient late urinary flare symptoms occurred at 9 to 18 months in 20% (90% CI, 3%-37%) of patients receiving SDRT. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this randomized clinical trial among patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer, SDRT was safe and associated with low toxicity, and the tumor control and quality-of-life end points closely match the SBRT arm outcomes. Further studies are encouraged to explore indications for SDRT in the cure of prostate cancer.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02570919.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.