Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33694293›Full record

ArticleAutism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research2021

Assessing the validity of administrative health data for the identification of children and youth with autism spectrum disorder in Ontario.

Jennifer D Brooks, Jasleen Arneja, Longdi Fu, Farah E Saxena, Karen Tu, Virgiliu Bogdan Pinzaru, Evdokia Anagnostou, Kirk Nylen, Natasha R Saunders, Hong Lu and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer D BrooksDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7574-4256
Jasleen ArnejaDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1913-6699
Longdi FuICES, G1 06, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Farah E SaxenaICES, G1 06, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Karen TuNorth York General Hospital, Toronto Western Hospital Family Health Team-University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Virgiliu Bogdan PinzaruICES, G1 06, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Evdokia AnagnostouHolland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kirk NylenOntario Brain Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Natasha R SaundersDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Hong LuICES, G1 06, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
John McLaughlinDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Susan E BronskillDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
University of Toronto · CAUniversity Health Network · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Population-level identification of children and youth with ASD is essential for surveillance and planning for required services. The objective of this study was to develop and validate an algorithm for the identification of children and youth with ASD using administrative health data. In this retrospective validation study, we linked an electronic medical record (EMR)-based reference standard, consisting 10,000 individuals aged 1-24 years, including 112 confirmed ASD cases to Ontario administrative health data, for the testing of multiple case-finding algorithms. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for each algorithm. The optimal algorithm was validated in three external cohorts representing family practice, education, and specialized clinical settings. The optimal algorithm included an ASD diagnostic code for a single hospital discharge or emergency department visit or outpatient surgery, or three ASD physician billing codes in 3 years. This algorithm's sensitivity was 50.0% (95%CI 40.7-88.7%), specificity 99.6% (99.4-99.7), PPV 56.6% (46.8-66.3), and NPV 99.4% (99.3-99.6). The results of this study illustrate limitations and need for cautious interpretation when using administrative health data alone for the identification of children and youth with ASD. LAY SUMMARY: We tested algorithms (set of rules) to identify young people with ASD using routinely collected administrative health data. Even the best algorithm misses more than half of those in Ontario with ASD. To understand this better, we tested how well the algorithm worked in different settings (family practice, education, and specialized clinics). The identification of individuals with ASD at a population level is essential for planning for support services and the allocation of resources. Autism Res 2021, 14: 1037-1045. © 2021 The Authors. Autism Research published by International Society for Autism Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum DisorderAdolescentAlgorithmsChildElectronic Health RecordsHumansOntarioRetrospective Studiesadministrative health dataalgorithmautismOntario

Identifiers

PMID33694293
PMCPMC8252648
OpenAlexW3135098925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.