Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33694227›Full record

ArticleGlobal change biology2021

The role of fire in global forest loss dynamics.

Dave van Wees, Guido R van der Werf, James T Randerson, Niels Andela, Yang Chen, Douglas C Morton

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global change biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
14.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 180 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Enhanced CHNature communications · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Impacts of fire and prospects for recovery in a tropical peat forest ecosystem.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Nucleation sites and forest recovery under high shrub competition.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2022
    Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Dave van WeesDepartment of Earth Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5565-7155
Guido R van der WerfDepartment of Earth Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9042-8630
James T RandersonDepartment of Earth System Science, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6559-7387
Niels AndelaSchool of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8241-6143
Yang ChenDepartment of Earth System Science, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0993-7081
Douglas C MortonBiospheric Sciences Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2226-1124
University of California, Irvine · USVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLCardiff University · GBGoddard Space Flight Center · US

Funding

NASA 80NSSC18K0179Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) 0.16.160.32Shared Services Center NASA 80NSSC18K0179
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fires, among other forms of natural and anthropogenic disturbance, play a central role in regulating the location, composition and biomass of forests. Understanding the role of fire in global forest loss is crucial in constraining land-use change emissions and the global carbon cycle. We analysed the relationship between forest loss and fire at 500 m resolution based on satellite-derived data for the 2003-2018 period. Satellite fire data included burned area and active fire detections, to best account for large and small fires, respectively. We found that, on average, 38 ± 9% (± range) of global forest loss was associated with fire, and this fraction remained relatively stable throughout the study period. However, the fraction of fire-related forest loss varied substantially on a regional basis, and showed statistically significant trends in key tropical forest areas. Decreases in the fraction of fire-related forest loss were found where deforestation peaked early in our study period, including the Amazon and Indonesia while increases were found for tropical forests in Africa. The inclusion of active fire detections accounted for 41%, on average, of the total fire-related forest loss, with larger contributions in small clearings in interior tropical forests and human-dominated landscapes. Comparison to higher-resolution fire data with resolutions of 375 and 20 m indicated that commission errors due to coarse resolution fire data largely balanced out omission errors due to missed small fire detections for regional to continental-scale estimates of fire-related forest loss. Besides an improved understanding of forest dynamics, these findings may help to refine and separate fire-related and non-fire-related land-use change emissions in forested ecosystems.

Indexed as

EcosystemFiresAfricaForestsHumansIndonesiaTreesactive firesburned areadeforestationfireforest losssatellite datatree mortality

Identifiers

PMID33694227
PMCPMC8251961
OpenAlexW3135430237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.