ArticleApplied clinical informatics2021
Assessing Prescriber Behavior with a Clinical Decision Support Tool to Prevent Drug-Induced Long QT Syndrome.
Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Drug-Induced QT Prolongation: Associations Between Risk Classifications in a Swedish Clinical Decision Support System and Clinical Outcomes.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Prescribed drugs and comorbidities as risk factors for Torsades de Pointes arrhythmia: a Swedish population-based cohort study.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Impact of an Alert-Based Inpatient Clinical Decision Support Tool to Prevent Drug-Induced Long QT Syndrome: Large-Scale, System-Wide Observational Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Observational
- AI-Powered Clinical Decision Support Systems in Disease Diagnosis, Treatment Planning, and Prognosis: A Systematic Review.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2025Review
- Evaluating the prescribing and monitoring of medications associated with QTc-prolongation in the ambulatory care setting.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2024Article
- A polygenic risk score for the QT interval is an independent predictor of drug-induced QT prolongation.PloS one · 2024Article
- Interpretable Machine Learning Prediction of Drug-Induced QT Prolongation: Electronic Health Record Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- Conundrum of Clinical QTc Monitoring.Drug safety · 2022Article
- Clinician Responses to a Clinical Decision Support Advisory for High Risk of Torsades de Pointes.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2022Article
- Low Efficacy of Medication Shortage Clinical Decision Support Alerts.Applied clinical informatics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveClinical decision support (CDS) alerts built into the electronic health record (EHR) have the potential to reduce the risk of drug-induced long QT syndrome (diLQTS) in susceptible patients. However, the degree to which providers incorporate this information into prescription behavior and the impact on patient outcomes is often unknown.
methodsWe examined provider response data over a period from October 8, 2016 until November 8, 2018 for a CDS alert deployed within the EHR from a 13-hospital integrated health care system that fires when a patient with a QTc ≥ 500 ms within the past 14 days is prescribed a known QT-prolonging medication. We used multivariate generalized estimating equations to analyze the impact of therapeutic alternatives, relative risk of diLQTS for specific medications, and patient characteristics on provider response to the CDS and overall patient mortality.
resultsThe CDS alert fired 15,002 times for 7,510 patients for which the most common response (51.0%) was to override the alert and order the culprit medication. In multivariate models, we found that patient age, relative risk of diLQTS, and presence of alternative agents were significant predictors of adherence to the CDS alerts and that nonadherence itself was a predictor of mortality. Risk of diLQTS and presence of an alternative agent are major factors in provider adherence to a CDS to prevent diLQTS; however, provider nonadherence was associated with a decreased risk of mortality.
conclusionSurrogate endpoints, such as provider adherence, can be useful measures of CDS value but attention to hard outcomes, such as mortality, is likely needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.