Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33694019›Full record

ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2021

Polypills in Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: Mass-Strategy Approach, Precision Medicine, or an Essential Intertwine Between Them?

Giuliano Generoso, Marcio Sommer Bittencourt

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Giuliano GenerosoDivision of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, University of São Paulo, Av. Lineu Prestes, 2565, CEP, São Paulo, 05508-000, Brazil.
Marcio Sommer BittencourtDivision of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, University of São Paulo, Av. Lineu Prestes, 2565, CEP, São Paulo, 05508-000, Brazil. msbittencourt@mail.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3711-1754
Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review considers the framework of high-risk vs. population approaches as proposed in the Rose's axiom within the context of cardiovascular diseases, including its benefits and limitations. We also contextualize the use of precision medicine in primary prevention therapy and contrast that with population approach. RECENT

findingsAlthough the high-risk strategy aims at individualized care, the complexity of pharmacologic regimens and other limitations reduces its real-life impact. On the other hand, broad population strategies include treatment of a substantial number of low-risk individuals who are unlikely to benefit from treatment. The use of additional strategies to identify those low-risk individuals, instead of targeting at identifying the high-risk population, is and alternative strategy to be considered. Evidence of the potential use of coronary artery calcium score and polypills for this strategy is discussed. A more targeted population approach to primary prevention in cardiovascular diseases with the use of polypills and coronary artery calcium score might be considered in a structured mass-strategy approach to risk reduction.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesDrug CombinationsHumansPrecision MedicinePrimary PreventionRisk FactorsDrug CombinationsCalcium scoreCardiovascular diseasePersonalized medicinePolypill

Identifiers

PMID33694019
OpenAlexW3135828489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.