Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33694011›Full record

ReviewCurrent hypertension reports2021

Current Updates on Pre-eclampsia: Maternal and Foetal Cardiovascular Diseases Predilection, Science or Myth? : Future cardiovascular disease risks in mother and child following pre-eclampsia.

Samson A Odukoya, Jagidesa Moodley, Thajasvarie Naicker

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current hypertension reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Samson A OdukoyaOptics and Imaging Center, Doris Duke Medical Research Institute, College of Health Sciences, University of Kwa-Zulu Natal, Durban, South Africa. ayoodukoya75@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6704-6060
Jagidesa MoodleyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, College of Health Sciences, University of Kwa-Zulu Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Thajasvarie NaickerOptics and Imaging Center, Doris Duke Medical Research Institute, College of Health Sciences, University of Kwa-Zulu Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Africa Health Research Institute · ZAUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal · ZAUniversity of Zululand · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewCardiovascular diseases (CVD), including pre-eclampsia (PE), remain the major cause of death and morbidity in women. This review elucidates the current knowledge, state of research and scientific information available on the post-event implications and complications of PE regarding maternal and foetal cardiovascular health. Does PE expose, predispose or aggravate a predilection to maternal and foetal CVD later in life? RECENT

findingsWomen with a history of PE are reported to have stiffer arteries and are more likely to develop cardiovascular problems with time, especially aortic stenosis and mitral regurgitation, which were not hitherto linked with hypertensive pregnancy. Foetal cells persistence in the mother long after pregnancy, now clearly established in the lungs of mice postpartum, is suggested to portend an overexpression of STOX1, which may potentiate later life CVD. Moreover, the conventional theories of in utero stress and developmental reprogramming may not adequately explain the risk of later life CVD predilection in offspring born to mothers with pre-eclampsia as recent data has shown that siblings of offspring born from pre-eclamptic pregnancies are also at higher risk of hypertension later in life, irrespective of whether subsequent pregnancies were pre-eclamptic or normotensive. The mechanism involved in adverse cardiovascular outcome in offspring of pre-eclamptic pregnancies is most likely an intricate interaction of foetal programming, environmental and genetic factors. In light of available evidence, the question of whether PE is just a pointer or predisposing factor to maternal development of CVDs in later life begs for answers to facilitate definitive clinical solutions and preventive approaches.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesHypertensionPre-EclampsiaAnimalsCarrier ProteinsChildFemaleHumansMiceMothersPostpartum PeriodPregnancyCarrier ProteinsSTOX1 protein, humanCardiovascularFoetalMaternalPredilectionPre-eclampsiaPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID33694011
OpenAlexW3135626276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.