Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33693994›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2021

Texture analysis using machine learning-based 3-T magnetic resonance imaging for predicting recurrence in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Na Lae Eun, Daesung Kang, Eun Ju Son, Ji Hyun Youk, Jeong-Ah Kim, Hye Mi Gweon

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Na Lae Eun *Department of Radiology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 211 Eonju-ro, Gangnam-gu, 06273, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Daesung Kang *Department of Healthcare Information Technology, Inje University, Gimhae, Republic of Korea.
Eun Ju SonDepartment of Radiology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 211 Eonju-ro, Gangnam-gu, 06273, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ji Hyun YoukDepartment of Radiology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 211 Eonju-ro, Gangnam-gu, 06273, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jeong-Ah KimDepartment of Radiology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 211 Eonju-ro, Gangnam-gu, 06273, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hye Mi GweonDepartment of Radiology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 211 Eonju-ro, Gangnam-gu, 06273, Seoul, Republic of Korea. hyemig@yuhs.ac.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3054-1532
Yonsei University · KRInje University · KR

Funding

Yonsei University College of Medicine 6-2020-0103
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine whether texture analysis for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can predict recurrence in patients with breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

methodsThis retrospective study included 130 women who received NAC and underwent subsequent surgery for breast cancer between January 2012 and August 2017. We assessed common features, including standard morphologic MRI features and clinicopathologic features. We used a  commercial software and analyzed texture features from pretreatment and midtreatment MRI. A random forest (RF) method was performed to build a model for predicting recurrence. The diagnostic performance of this model for predicting recurrence was assessed and compared with those of five other machine learning classifiers using the Wald test.

resultsOf the 130 women, 21 (16.2%) developed recurrence at a median follow-up of 35.4 months. The RF classifier with common features including clinicopathologic and morphologic MRI features showed the lowest diagnostic performance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC], 0.83). The texture analysis with the RF method showed the highest diagnostic performances for pretreatment T2-weighted images and midtreatment DWI and ADC maps showed better diagnostic performance than that of an analysis of common features (AUC, 0.94 vs. 0.83, p < 0.05). The RF model based on all sequences showed a better diagnostic performance for predicting recurrence than did the five other machine learning classifiers.

conclusionsTexture analysis using an RF model for pretreatment and midtreatment MRI may provide valuable prognostic information for predicting recurrence in patients with breast cancer treated with NAC and surgery. KEY POINTS: • RF model-based texture analysis showed a superior diagnostic performance than traditional MRI and clinicopathologic features (AUC, 0.94 vs.0.83, p < 0.05) for predicting recurrence in breast cancer after NAC. • Texture analysis using RF classifier showed the highest diagnostic performances (AUC, 0.94) for pretreatment T2-weighted images and midtreatment DWI and ADC maps. • RF model showed a better diagnostic performance for predicting recurrence than did the five other machine learning classifiers.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsNeoadjuvant TherapyFemaleHumansMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective StudiesBreast neoplasmsMachine learningMagnetic resonance imagingRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID33693994
OpenAlexW3135740405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.