ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2021
Segmentation of white matter hyperintensities on
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Applications of Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) in Positron Emission Tomography (PET) imaging: A review.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022Review
- Article
- Gross Tumor Volume Definition and Comparative Assessment for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma From 3DFrontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWhite matter hyperintensities (WMH) are typically segmented using MRI because WMH are hardly visible on
methodsWe selected patients whose interval between MRI and FDG PET/CT scans was within 3 months, from January 2017 to December 2018, and classified them into mild, moderate, and severe groups by following the semiquantitative rating method of Fazekas. For each group, 50 patients were selected, and of them, we randomly selected 35 patients for training and 15 for testing. WMH were automatically segmented from FLAIR MRI with manual adjustment. Patches of WMH were extracted from
resultsThe DSC values were associated with WMH volumes on MRI. For volumes >60 mL, the DSC values were 0.751 for W
conclusionsAlthough limited by visual analysis, the W
Indexed as
Identifiers
33693968What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.