Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33693758›Full record

Observational studyThe Journal of nutrition2021

Personalized Profiling Reveals Donor- and Lactation-Specific Trends in the Human Milk Proteome and Peptidome.

Jing Zhu, Kelly A Dingess, Marko Mank, Bernd Stahl, Albert J R Heck

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The Journal of nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Cellular and transcriptional diversity over the course of human lactation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Changes in Antisecretory Factor in Human Milk During the Postpartum and Length of Gestation.Journal of human lactation : official journal of International Lactation Consultant Association · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jing ZhuBiomolecular Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research and Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Kelly A DingessBiomolecular Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research and Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marko MankDanone Nutricia Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Bernd StahlDanone Nutricia Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Albert J R HeckBiomolecular Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research and Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Netherlands Metabolomics Centre · NLNutricia Research (Netherlands) · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHuman milk is the most genuine form of personalized nutrition, whereby its nutritional and bioactive constituents support the changing needs of the growing infant. Personalized proteome profiling strategies may provide insights into maternal-infant relationships. Proteins and endogenous peptides in human milk play an important role as nutrients for growth and have distinct functionality such as immune defense. Comprehensive monitoring of all of the human milk proteinaceous components, including endogenous peptides, is required to fully understand the changing role of the human milk proteome throughout lactation.

objectiveWe aimed to investigate the personalized nature of the human milk proteome and peptidome for individual mother-infant dyads.

methodsTwo individual healthy milk donors, aged 29 and 32 y and both of a normal BMI, were longitudinally observed over weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 postpartum. Milk collection was standardized. Comprehensive variations in the human milk proteinaceous components were assessed using quantitative LC-MS/MS methods.

resultsWe longitudinally profiled the concentrations of >1300 milk proteins and 2000 endogenous milk peptides spanning 16 wk of lactation for 2 individual donors. We observed many gradual and alike changes in both donors related to temporal effects, for instance early lactation was marked by high concentrations of proteins and peptides involved in lactose synthesis and immune development. Uniquely, in 1 of the 2 donors, we observed a substantial anomaly in the milk composition, exclusively at week 6, likely indicating a response to inflammation and/or infection.

conclusionsHere, we provide a resource for characterizing the lactational changes in the human milk proteome, encompassing thousands of proteins and endogenous peptides. Further, we demonstrate the feasibility and benefit of personalized profiling to monitor the influence of milk on the development of the newborn, as well as the health status of each individual mother-infant pair.

Indexed as

AdultChromatography, LiquidDigestive System Physiological PhenomenaFemaleHumansImmunoglobulinsInfantInfant, NewbornInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaLactationLongitudinal StudiesMilk, HumanMilk ProteinsPeptidesPolysaccharidesPostpartum PeriodImmunoglobulinsMilk ProteinsPeptidesPolysaccharidesProteomehuman milk compositionlactationpeptidomicspersonalized profilingproteomics

Identifiers

PMID33693758
PMCPMC8030701
OpenAlexW3133958029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.