ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2021
LI Detector: a framework for sensitive colony-based screens regardless of the distribution of fitness effects.
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Normalization Protocol Reduces Edge Effect in High-Throughput Analyses of Hydroxyurea Hypersensitivity in Fission Yeast.Biomedicines · 2023Article
- A vast evolutionarily transient translatome contributes to phenotype and fitness.Cell systems · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microbial growth characteristics have long been used to investigate fundamental questions of biology. Colony-based high-throughput screens enable parallel fitness estimation of thousands of individual strains using colony growth as a proxy for fitness. However, fitness estimation is complicated by spatial biases affecting colony growth, including uneven nutrient distribution, agar surface irregularities, and batch effects. Analytical methods that have been developed to correct for these spatial biases rely on the following assumptions: (1) that fitness effects are normally distributed, and (2) that most genetic perturbations lead to minor changes in fitness. Although reasonable for many applications, these assumptions are not always warranted and can limit the ability to detect small fitness effects. Beneficial fitness effects, in particular, are notoriously difficult to detect under these assumptions. Here, we developed the linear interpolation-based detector (LI Detector) framework to enable sensitive colony-based screening without making prior assumptions about the underlying distribution of fitness effects. The LI Detector uses a grid of reference colonies to assign a relative fitness value to every colony on the plate. We show that the LI Detector is effective in correcting for spatial biases and equally sensitive toward increase and decrease in fitness. LI Detector offers a tunable system that allows the user to identify small fitness effects with unprecedented sensitivity and specificity. LI Detector can be utilized to develop and refine gene-gene and gene-environment interaction networks of colony-forming organisms, including yeast, by increasing the range of fitness effects that can be reliably detected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.