Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33693602›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2021

Gene-level quantitative trait mapping in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Luke M Noble, Matthew V Rockman, Henrique Teotónio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Conservative evolution of genetic and genomic features inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Variation in mutational (co)variances.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2023
    Article
  8. Phenotypic stasis with genetic divergence.Peer community journal · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Rapid Isolation of Wild Nematodes by Baermann Funnel.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Luke M NobleInstitut de Biologie, École Normale Supérieure, CNRS 8197, Inserm U1024, PSL Research University, F-75005 Paris, France.
Matthew V RockmanDepartment of Biology, Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA.
Henrique TeotónioInstitut de Biologie, École Normale Supérieure, CNRS 8197, Inserm U1024, PSL Research University, F-75005 Paris, France.

Funding

Genetic analysis of segregating recessive variationR01GM121828 · NIGMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI ROCKMAN, MATTHEW · 2017 to 2020
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM121828
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Caenorhabditis elegans multiparental experimental evolution (CeMEE) panel is a collection of genome-sequenced, cryopreserved recombinant inbred lines useful for mapping the evolution and genetic basis of quantitative traits. We have expanded the resource with new lines and new populations, and here report the genotype and haplotype composition of CeMEE version 2, including a large set of putative de novo mutations, and updated additive and epistatic mapping simulations. Additive quantitative trait loci explaining 4% of trait variance are detected with >80% power, and the median detection interval approaches single-gene resolution on the highly recombinant chromosome arms. Although CeMEE populations are derived from a long-term evolution experiment, genetic structure is dominated by variation present in the ancestral population.

Indexed as

Caenorhabditis elegansQuantitative Trait LociAnimalsChromosome MappingGenotypePhenotypecomplex traitexperimental evolutiongenetic architectureMPPMultiparent Advanced Generation Inter-Cross (MAGIC)Multiparental PopulationsQTLquantitative trait

Identifiers

PMID33693602
PMCPMC8022935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.