Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33693546›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2021

Omixer: multivariate and reproducible sample randomization to proactively counter batch effects in omics studies.

Lucy Sinke, Davy Cats, Bastiaan T Heijmans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Early-life exposure to cigarette smoke primes lung function and DNA methylation changes atAmerican journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2023
    Article
  14. Transdiagnostic evaluation of epigenetic age acceleration and burden of psychiatric disorders.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lucy SinkeMolecular Epidemiology, Department of Biomedical Data Science, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden 2333 ZC, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9209-1266
Davy CatsMolecular Epidemiology, Department of Biomedical Data Science, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden 2333 ZC, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9684-220X
Bastiaan T HeijmansMolecular Epidemiology, Department of Biomedical Data Science, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden 2333 ZC, The Netherlands.

Funding

DIMENSION project 529051021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationBatch effects heavily impact results in omics studies, causing bias and false positive results, but software to control them preemptively is lacking. Sample randomization prior to measurement is vital for minimizing these effects, but current approaches are often ad hoc, poorly documented and ill-equipped to handle multiple batches and outcomes.

resultsWe developed Omixer-a Bioconductor package implementing multivariate and reproducible sample randomization for omics studies. It proactively counters correlations between technical factors and biological variables of interest by optimizing sample distribution across batches. AVAILABILITYAND IMPLEMENTATION: Omixer is available from Bioconductor at http://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/Omixer.html. Scripts and data used to generate figures available upon request. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

SoftwareRandom Allocation

Identifiers

PMID33693546
PMCPMC10262301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.