Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33693418›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in big data2020

Interdisciplinary Research in Artificial Intelligence: Challenges and Opportunities.

Remy Kusters, Dusan Misevic, Hugues Berry, Antoine Cully, Yann Le Cunff, Loic Dandoy, Natalia Díaz-Rodríguez, Marion Ficher, Jonathan Grizou, Alice Othmani and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in big data, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Artificial Intelligence and the future of clinical trials.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A Call to Action on Assessing and Mitigating Bias in Artificial Intelligence Applications for Mental Health.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2023
    Review
  19. Scientific novelty beyond the experiment.Microbial biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Remy KustersINSERM U1284, Université de Paris, Center for Research and Interdisciplinarity (CRI), Paris, France.
Dusan MisevicINSERM U1284, Université de Paris, Center for Research and Interdisciplinarity (CRI), Paris, France.
Hugues BerryInria, Villeurbanne, France.
Antoine CullyImperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Yann Le CunffUniversity of Rennes, Rennes, France.
Loic DandoyINSERM U1284, Université de Paris, Center for Research and Interdisciplinarity (CRI), Paris, France.
Natalia Díaz-RodríguezInria Flowers, Paris and Bordeaux, France.
Marion FicherINSERM U1284, Université de Paris, Center for Research and Interdisciplinarity (CRI), Paris, France.
Jonathan GrizouINSERM U1284, Université de Paris, Center for Research and Interdisciplinarity (CRI), Paris, France.
Alice OthmaniUniversité Paris-Est, LISSI, Vitry sur Seine, France.
Themis PalpanasUniversité de Paris, France and French University Institute (IUF), Paris, France.
Matthieu KomorowskiImperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Patrick LoiseauUniversité Grenoble Alpes, Inria, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LIG, Grenoble, France.
Clément Moulin FrierInria Flowers, Paris and Bordeaux, France.
Santino NaniniINSERM U1284, Université de Paris, Center for Research and Interdisciplinarity (CRI), Paris, France.
Daniele QuerciaNokia Bell Labs, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Michele SebagTAU, LRI-CNRS-INRIA, Universite Paris-Saclay, France.
Françoise Soulié FogelmanHub France Intelligence Artificielle, Paris, France.
Sofiane TalebINSERM U1284, Université de Paris, Center for Research and Interdisciplinarity (CRI), Paris, France.
Liubov TupikinaINSERM U1284, Université de Paris, Center for Research and Interdisciplinarity (CRI), Paris, France.
Vaibhav SahuINSERM U1284, Université de Paris, Center for Research and Interdisciplinarity (CRI), Paris, France.
Jill-Jênn VieInria, Lille, France.
Fatima WehbiINSERM U1284, Université de Paris, Center for Research and Interdisciplinarity (CRI), Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in a variety of research fields is speeding up multiple digital revolutions, from shifting paradigms in healthcare, precision medicine and wearable sensing, to public services and education offered to the masses around the world, to future cities made optimally efficient by autonomous driving. When a revolution happens, the consequences are not obvious straight away, and to date, there is no uniformly adapted framework to guide AI research to ensure a sustainable societal transition. To answer this need, here we analyze three key challenges to interdisciplinary AI research, and deliver three broad conclusions: 1) future development of AI should not only impact other scientific domains but should also take inspiration and benefit from other fields of science, 2) AI research must be accompanied by decision explainability, dataset bias transparency as well as development of evaluation methodologies and creation of regulatory agencies to ensure responsibility, and 3) AI education should receive more attention, efforts and innovation from the educational and scientific communities. Our analysis is of interest not only to AI practitioners but also to other researchers and the general public as it offers ways to guide the emerging collaborations and interactions toward the most fruitful outcomes.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceauditabilityeducationethicsinterdisciplinary scienceinterpretability

Identifiers

PMID33693418
PMCPMC7931862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.