ArticleFrontiers in big data2019
Bioactivity Signatures of Drugs vs. Environmental Chemicals Revealed by Tox21 High-Throughput Screening Assays.
Article in Frontiers in big data, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis of in vitro profiling data of cosmetic ingredients within the Tox21 10K compound library for bioactivity and potential toxicity.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2026Article
- Screening and characterization of 133 physiologically-relevant environmental chemicals for reproductive toxicity.Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- In vitro profiling of pesticides within the Tox21 10K compound library for bioactivity and potential toxicity.Toxicology and applied pharmacology · 2023Article
- In vivo quantitative high-throughput screening for drug discovery and comparative toxicology.Disease models & mechanisms · 2023Article
- Repurposing drugs as COVID-19 therapies: A toxicity evaluation.Drug discovery today · 2022Review
- Prediction Models for Agonists and Antagonists of Molecular Initiation Events for Toxicity Pathways Using an Improved Deep-Learning-Based Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship System.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- The Tox21 10K Compound Library: Collaborative Chemistry Advancing Toxicology.Chemical research in toxicology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Humans are exposed to tens of thousands of chemicals over the course of a lifetime, yet there remains inadequate data on the potential harmful effects of these substances on human health. Using quantitative high-throughput screening (qHTS), we can test these compounds for potential toxicity in a more efficient and cost-effective way compared to traditional animal studies. Tox21 has developed a library of ~10,000 chemicals (Tox21 10K) comprising one-third approved and investigational drugs and two-thirds environmental chemicals. In this study, the Tox21 10K was screened in a qHTS format against a panel of 70 cell-based assays with 213 readouts covering a broad range of biological pathways. Activity profiles were compared with chemical structure to assess their ability to differentiate drugs from environmental chemicals, and structure was found to be a better predictor of which chemicals are likely to be drugs. Drugs and environmental chemicals were further analyzed for diversity in structure and biological response space and showed distinguishable, but not distinct, responses in the Tox21 assays. Inclusion of other targets and pathways to further diversify the biological response space covered by these assays is likely required to better evaluate the safety profile of drugs and environmental chemicals to prioritize for in-depth toxicological studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.