Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33693366›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in big data2019

Open Science, Open Data, and Open Scholarship: European Policies to Make Science Fit for the Twenty-First Century.

Jean-Claude Burgelman, Corina Pascu, Katarzyna Szkuta, Rene Von Schomberg, Athanasios Karalopoulos, Konstantinos Repanas, Michel Schouppe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in big data, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Our AI-Powered Discoveries Are Trapped in a Predigital System.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Open Science Training in TRIPLE.Open research Europe · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jean-Claude BurgelmanOpen Science, DG Research and Innovation, European Commission, Brussels, Belgium.
Corina PascuOpen Science, DG Research and Innovation, European Commission, Brussels, Belgium.
Katarzyna SzkutaOpen Science, DG Research and Innovation, European Commission, Brussels, Belgium.
Rene Von SchombergOpen Science, DG Research and Innovation, European Commission, Brussels, Belgium.
Athanasios KaralopoulosOpen Science, DG Research and Innovation, European Commission, Brussels, Belgium.
Konstantinos RepanasOpen Science, DG Research and Innovation, European Commission, Brussels, Belgium.
Michel SchouppeOpen Science, DG Research and Innovation, European Commission, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Open science will make science more efficient, reliable, and responsive to societal challenges. The European Commission has sought to advance open science policy from its inception in a holistic and integrated way, covering all aspects of the research cycle from scientific discovery and review to sharing knowledge, publishing, and outreach. We present the steps taken with a forward-looking perspective on the challenges laying ahead, in particular the necessary change of the rewards and incentives system for researchers (for which various actors are co-responsible and which goes beyond the mandate of the European Commission). Finally, we discuss the role of artificial intelligence (AI) within an open science perspective.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceEuropean science policiesopen accessopen dataopen scholarshipopen science

Identifiers

PMID33693366
PMCPMC7931888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.