Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33693063›Full record

ArticleWellcome open research2021

Top five ethical lessons of COVID-19 that the world must learn.

Maxwell J Smith, Aasim Ahmad, Thalia Arawi, Angus Dawson, Ezekiel J Emanuel, T Garani-Papadatos, Prakash Ghimire, Zubairu Iliyasu, Ruipeng Lei, Ignacio Mastroleo and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wellcome open research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Pandemic treaty textual analysis: ethics and public health implications.Journal of public health (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Assistive Technology Provider Experiences during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Maxwell J SmithUniversity of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5230-0548
Aasim AhmadThe Kidney Centre Post Graduate Training Institute, Karachi, Pakistan.
Thalia ArawiAmerican University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Angus DawsonUniversity of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Ezekiel J EmanuelUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
T Garani-PapadatosUniversity of West Attica, Athens, Greece.
Prakash GhimireTribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Zubairu IliyasuBayero University Kano, Kano, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8669-1863
Ruipeng LeiHuazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Ignacio MastroleoNational Scientific and Technical Research Council, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8243-9943
Roli MathurNational Center for Disease Informatics and Research (ICMR-NCDIR), Bengaluru, India.
Joseph OkeibunorUniversity of Nigeria Nsukka, Nsukka, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6696-8503
Michael ParkerUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7054-4711
Carla SaenzPan American Health Organization, Washington, DC, USA.
Beatriz ThoméUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3941-3756
Ross E G UpshurUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1128-0557
Teck Chuan VooNational University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4757-7328

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the world reflects upon one year since the first cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and prepare for and experience surges in cases, it is important to identify the most crucial ethical issues that might lie ahead so that countries are able to plan accordingly. Some ethical issues are rather obvious to predict, such as the ethical issues surrounding the use of immunity certificates, contact tracing, and the fair allocation of vaccines globally. Yet, the most significant ethical challenge that the world must address in the next year and beyond is to ensure that we learn the ethical lessons of the first year of this pandemic. Learning from our collective experiences thus far constitutes our greatest moral obligation. Appreciating that decision-making in the context of a pandemic is constrained by unprecedented complexity and uncertainty, beginning in June 2020, an international group of 17 experts in bioethics spanning 15 countries (including low-, middle-, and high-income countries) met virtually to identify what we considered to be the most significant ethical challenges and accompanying lessons faced thus far in the COVID-19 pandemic. Once collected, the group met over the course of several virtual meetings to identify challenges and lessons that are analytically distinct in order to identify common ethical themes under which different challenges and lessons could be grouped. The result, described in this paper, is what this expert group consider to be the top five ethical lessons from the initial experience with COVID-19 that must be learned.

Indexed as

COVID-19Ethics

Identifiers

PMID33693063
PMCPMC7919608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.