Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33693053›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on computational imaging2020

Efficient Regularized Field Map Estimation in 3D MRI.

Claire Yilin Lin, Jeffrey A Fessler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on computational imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Claire Yilin LinDepartment of Mathematics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109 USA.
Jeffrey A FesslerDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA.

Funding

High SNR Functional Brain Imaging using Oscillating Steady State MRIU01EB026977 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI NOLL, DOUGLAS C · 2018 to 2022
$2.8M
Fast Functional MRI with Sparse Sampling and Model-Based ReconstructionR01EB023618 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI FESSLER, JEFFREY A, NOLL, DOUGLAS C · 2017 to 2020
$1.5M
Toward robust whole-brain 3D functional MRI at 3T with reduced signal loss artifactsR21AG061839 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI NIELSEN, JON-FREDRIK · 2019 to 2020
$408k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG061839NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB023618NIBIB NIH HHS U01 EB026977
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic field inhomogeneity estimation is important in some types of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including field-corrected reconstruction for fast MRI with long readout times, and chemical shift based water-fat imaging. Regularized field map estimation methods that account for phase wrapping and noise involve nonconvex cost functions that require iterative algorithms. Most existing minimization techniques were computationally or memory intensive for 3D datasets, and are designed for single-coil MRI. This paper considers 3D MRI with optional consideration of coil sensitivity, and addresses the multi-echo field map estimation and water-fat imaging problem. Our efficient algorithm uses a preconditioned nonlinear conjugate gradient method based on an incomplete Cholesky factorization of the Hessian of the cost function, along with a monotonic line search. Numerical experiments show the computational advantage of the proposed algorithm over state-of-the-art methods with similar memory requirements.

Indexed as

field map estimationincomplete Cholesky factorizationMagnetic field inhomogeneitymonotonic line searchpreconditioned conjugate gradientwater-fat imaging

Identifiers

PMID33693053
PMCPMC7943027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.