ArticleFrontiers in medicine2021
Assessment of Image Quality and Lesion Detectability With Digital PET/CT System.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Insertion of synthetic lesions on patient data: a method for evaluating clinical performance differences between PET systems.EJNMMI physics · 2024Article
- Impact of respiratory motion onJournal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023Article
- PET imaging and quantification of small animals using a clinical SiPM-based camera.EJNMMI physics · 2023Article
- Automated F18-FDG PET/CT image quality assessment using deep neural networks on a latest 6-ring digital detector system.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Multicentric development and evaluation ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023Article
- Enhancement ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Dynamic PET Imaging Using Dual Texture Features.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.