Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33692969›Full record

ArticleResearch and reports in urology2021

Effect of Prolonged Duration of Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy of the Prostate and Pre-Procedure Anxiety on Pain in Patients without Anesthesia.

Yasushi Nakai, Nobumichi Tanaka, Toshihiko Matsubara, Satoshi Anai, Makito Miyake, Shunta Hori, Tomomi Fujii, Chiho Ohbayashi, Kiyohide Fujimoto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research and reports in urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. ISUOG/ESGO Consensus Statement on ultrasound-guided biopsy in gynecological oncology.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yasushi NakaiDepartment of Urology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan.
Nobumichi TanakaDepartment of Urology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9242-7877
Toshihiko MatsubaraDepartment of Urology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan.
Satoshi AnaiDepartment of Urology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan.
Makito MiyakeDepartment of Urology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9503-7356
Shunta HoriDepartment of Urology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9514-9964
Tomomi FujiiDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan.
Chiho OhbayashiDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan.
Kiyohide FujimotoDepartment of Urology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan.
Nara Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate factors correlated with pain during prostate biopsy and willingness to undergo transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TR-PBx) again without anesthesia in patients undergoing TR-PBx without anesthesia.

methodsThis retrospective, single-center study evaluated 624 patients who underwent TR-PBx without anesthesia. Based on a nomogram using patient age and prostate volume, 6-12 core biopsy samples were allocated. Anxiety was evaluated using the Faces Anxiety Scale before the TR-PBx. Pain was evaluated using the Faces Pain Scale at each puncture and immediately after confirmation of cessation of bleeding from the rectum after the transrectal probe was pulled out. The question "If this operation must be repeated, would you agree to undergo it again under same conditions?" was asked after the procedure was completed. The change in pain at each puncture and factors correlated with post-procedural pain were calculated using multiple regression analysis, and factors predicting an answer of "yes" to the question using binary logistic analysis were evaluated.

resultsScores on the Faces Pain Scale significantly increased from the first core sample to last as the number of samples increased. However, the number of samples did not show significant correlation with pain evaluated after the procedure was complete. Time during the biopsy and the anxiety score had a significant correlation with the pain scale score for the completed procedure. Short duration of TR-biopsy and a low anxiety score predicted a reply of "Yes" to the question.

conclusionA long operative time during the TR-PBx procedure and strong pre-procedure anxiety can increase pain for patients undergoing the procedure without anesthesia and cause patients to be unwilling to undergo TR-PBx again without anesthesia.

Indexed as

anesthesiaanxietybiopsypainprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID33692969
PMCPMC7939514
OpenAlexW3133529953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.