Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33692950›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021

Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography-Based Radiomics Nomogram for the Prediction of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy-Insensitive Breast Cancers.

Zhongyi Wang, Fan Lin, Heng Ma, Yinghong Shi, Jianjun Dong, Ping Yang, Kun Zhang, Na Guo, Ran Zhang, Jingjing Cui and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. State-of-the-art for contrast-enhanced mammography.The British journal of radiology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Zhongyi WangSchool of Medical Imaging, Binzhou Medical University, Yantai, China.
Fan LinSchool of Medical Imaging, Binzhou Medical University, Yantai, China.
Heng MaDepartment of Radiology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, China.
Yinghong ShiDepartment of Radiology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, China.
Jianjun DongDepartment of Radiology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, China.
Ping YangDepartment of Pathology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, China.
Kun ZhangDepartment of Breast Surgery, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, China.
Na GuoCollaboration Department, Huiying Medical Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.
Ran ZhangCollaboration Department, Huiying Medical Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.
Jingjing CuiCollaboration Department, Huiying Medical Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.
Shaofeng DuanPrecision Health Institution, GE Healthcare, Shanghai, China.
Ning MaoDepartment of Radiology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, China.
Haizhu XieDepartment of Radiology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, China.
Qingdao University · CNYuhuangding Hospital · CNAffiliated Hospital of Qingdao University · CNUnited Imaging Healthcare (China) · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe developed and validated a contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM)-based radiomics nomogram to predict neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC)-insensitive breast cancers prior to treatment.

methodsWe enrolled 117 patients with breast cancer who underwent CESM examination and NAC treatment from July 2017 to April 2019. The patients were grouped randomly into a training set (n = 97) and a validation set (n = 20) in a ratio of 8:2. 792 radiomics features were extracted from CESM images including low-energy and recombined images for each patient. Optimal radiomics features were selected by using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression with 10-fold cross-validation, to develop a radiomics score in the training set. A radiomics nomogram incorporating the radiomics score and independent clinical risk factors was then developed using multivariate logistic regression analysis. With regard to discrimination and clinical usefulness, radiomics nomogram was evaluated using the area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) and decision curve analysis (DCA).

resultsThe radiomics nomogram that incorporates 11 radiomics features and 3 independent clinical risk factors, including Ki-67 index, background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) status, showed an encouraging discrimination power with AUCs of 0.877 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.816 to 0.924] and 0.81 (95% CI 0.575 to 0.948) in the training and validation sets, respectively. DCA revealed the increased clinical usefulness of this nomogram.

conclusionThe proposed radiomics nomogram that integrates CESM-derived radiomics features and clinical parameters showed potential feasibility for predicting NAC-insensitive breast cancers.

Indexed as

breast cancercontrast-enhanced spectral mammographneoadjuvant chemotherapyoncologyradiomics

Identifiers

PMID33692950
PMCPMC7937952
OpenAlexW3133062128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.