ArticleGastroHep2020
The association of
Article in GastroHep, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Changes in intestinal microbiota in patients with pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Pooled it
- Deciphering the intratumor microbiota in malignant gastrointestinal tumors: multifaceted interplay and clinical implications.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026Review
- Impact of gut microbiome in the development and treatment of pancreatic cancer: Newer insights.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023Review
- Bibliometric analysis of global research trends between gut microbiota and pancreatic cancer: from 2004 to 2023.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Review
- Review
- The impact of the human microbiome in tumorigenesis, cancer progression, and biotherapeutic development.BMC microbiology · 2022Review
- Gastric Mucosal Abnormality and Risk of Pancreatic Cancer: A Population-Based Gastric Biopsy Cohort Study in Sweden.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND &
aimsInfection with
methodsRetrospective cohort study within the Veterans Administration of 103,595 patients (median age 62.3; 92.0% male) with HP diagnosis based on pathology, stool antigen, urea breath test, or serum antibody between 1/1/1994-12/31/2018. Primary outcome was future PC diagnosis. A time to event with competing risk analysis was performed, evaluating patient demographics and history, method of HP diagnosis, and whether the patient received HP treatment. Secondary analysis of those treated evaluated whether confirmed eradication was associated with PC.
resultsThe cumulative incidence of PC at 5 and 10 years was 0.37% and 0.54%, respectively. Patients who developed PC were older, male, reside in areas with higher poverty. Preceding diabetes and chronic pancreatitis were strongly associated with PC. Factors not associated with PC included receiving an eradication regimen, diagnosis of an active infection (versus prior exposure alone), and eradication of HP.
conclusionsPC after HP is rare. Chronic pancreatitis is the main risk factor for PC. Active HP infection, treatment of HP infection, or eradication of HP are not associated with future PC. This study calls into question the association between PC and HP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.