ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2021
Correction of topological errors in automated traces of neurites.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Our understanding of synaptic connectivity in the brain relies on the ability to accurately trace sparsely labeled neurons from 3D optical microscopy stacks of images. A variety of automated algorithms and software tools have been developed for this task. These algorithms can capture the general layout of neurites with high fidelity, but the resulting traces often contain topological errors such as broken and incorrectly merged branches. Even a small number of isolated topological errors can drastically alter the connectivity, and therefore, their detection and correction are paramount for connectomics studies. Here, we describe an automated trace proofreading approach that utilizes machine learning to correct trace topology. Multiple stacks of neuron images were traced by two users to create a labeled dataset and assess the baseline of inter-user variability. All traces were then disconnected at branch points and a deep neural network was trained to detect the correct way of reconnecting the branches. Custom morphological features were generated for each cluster of branch points, in a way that is dependent on a merging scenario but invariant to translations, rotations, and reflections of the cluster in the imaging plane. The features and image volume centered at the branch point were used for training a neural network that concatenates these input streams and outputs the confidence measure for different branch merging scenarios. The designed method significantly reduces the number of topological errors in automated traces and comes close to the accuracy achieved by expert users which is the gold standard in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.