ArticleJournal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics2019
RNASeqDesign: A framework for RNA-Seq genome-wide power calculation and study design issues.
Article in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- How thoughtful experimental design can empower biologists in the omics era.Nature communications · 2025Review
- A realistic FastQ-based framework FastQDesign for ScRNA-seq study design issues.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Gene expression of Decompression Sickness-resistant rats through a miRnome/transcriptome crossed approach.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Liquid biopsy: an examination of platelet RNA obtained from head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients for predictive molecular tumor markers.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Massively parallel sequencing (a.k.a. next-generation sequencing, NGS) technology has emerged as a powerful tool in characterizing genomic profiles. Among many NGS applications, RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) has gradually become a standard tool for global transcriptomic monitoring. Although the cost of NGS experiments has dropped constantly, the high sequencing cost and bioinformatic complexity are still obstacles for many biomedical projects. Unlike earlier fluorescence-based technologies such as microarray, modelling of NGS data should consider discrete count data. In addition to sample size, sequencing depth also directly relates to the experimental cost. Consequently, given total budget and pre-specified unit experimental cost, the study design issue in RNA-Seq is conceptually a more complex multi-dimensional constrained optimization problem rather than one-dimensional sample size calculation in traditional hypothesis setting. In this paper, we propose a statistical framework, namely "RNASeqDesign", to utilize pilot data for power calculation and study design of RNA-Seq experiments. The approach is based on mixture model fitting of p-value distribution from pilot data and a parametric bootstrap procedure based on approximated Wald test statistics to infer genome-wide power for optimal sample size and sequencing depth. We further illustrate five practical study design tasks for practitioners. We perform simulations and three real applications to evaluate the performance and compare to existing methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.