Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33692572›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neurology2021

Multifaceted microglia - key players in primary brain tumour heterogeneity.

Lily Keane, Mathilde Cheray, Klas Blomgren, Bertrand Joseph

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lily KeaneInstitute of Environmental Medicine, Toxicology Unit, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7418-3434
Mathilde CherayInstitute of Environmental Medicine, Toxicology Unit, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7551-6357
Klas BlomgrenDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0476-7271
Bertrand JosephInstitute of Environmental Medicine, Toxicology Unit, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. bertrand.joseph@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5655-9979

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microglia are the resident innate immune cells of the immune-privileged CNS and, as such, represent the first line of defence against tissue injury and infection. Given their location, microglia are undoubtedly the first immune cells to encounter a developing primary brain tumour. Our knowledge of these cells is therefore important to consider in the context of such neoplasms. As the heterogeneous nature of the most aggressive primary brain tumours is thought to underlie their poor prognosis, this Review places a special emphasis on the heterogeneity of the tumour-associated microglia and macrophage populations present in primary brain tumours. Where available, specific information on microglial heterogeneity in various types and subtypes of brain tumour is included. Emerging evidence that highlights the importance of considering the heterogeneity of both the tumour and of microglial populations in providing improved treatment outcomes for patients is also discussed.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsMicrogliaAnimalsHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.