Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33692145›Full record

ReviewBMJ global health2021

On the importance of primary and community healthcare in relation to global health and environmental threats: lessons from the COVID-19 crisis.

Paolo Lauriola, Piedad Martín-Olmedo, Giovanni S Leonardi, Catherine Bouland, Robert Verheij, Michel L A Dückers, Martie van Tongeren, Ferdinando Laghi, Peter van den Hazel, Ozden Gokdemir and 15 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ global health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Towards Resilient Healthcare Systems: A Framework for Crisis Management.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Paolo LauriolaInternational Society of Doctors for the Environment (ISDE-Italy), Modena, Italy Ariana.Zeka@brunel.ac.uk paolo.lauriola@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4768-6612
Piedad Martín-OlmedoEscuela Andaluza de Salud Pública, Granada, Spain.
Giovanni S LeonardiDepartment of Public Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7477-1762
Catherine BoulandULB-Ecole de Santé Publique, Bruxelles, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-3085-0543
Robert VerheijNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Michel L A DückersNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7746-053X
Martie van TongerenCentre for Occupational and Environmental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Ferdinando LaghiInternational Society of Doctors for the Environment (ISDE-Int'l), Geneva, Switzerland.
Peter van den HazelInternational Network on Children's Health, Environment and Safety (INCHES), Ellecom, The Netherlands.
Ozden GokdemirFaculty of Medicine, Izmir University of Economics, Balçova/Izmir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-0542-5767
Evelyn SegredoUruguayan Society of Family and Community Medicine, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Ruth A EtzelMilken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Alan AbelsohnDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Fabrizio BianchiIstituto Fisiologia Clinica, Consiglio Nazionale della Ricerca (CNR-IFC), Pisa, Italy.
Roberto RomiziInternational Society of Doctors for the Environment (ISDE-Italy), Arezzo, Italy.
Giuseppe MiserottiInternational Society of Doctors for the Environment (ISDE-Italy), Piacenza, Italy.
Francesco RomiziInternational Society of Doctors for the Environment (ISDE-Italy), Arezzo, Italy.
Paolo BortolottiMedical Order Trento, Trento, Italy.
Emanuele VinciHealth and Environment Working Group, National Medical Orders Federation, Rome, Italy.
Guido GiustettoNational Medical Orders Federation, Rome, Italy.
Mariagrazia SantamariaLocal Health Authority, Foggia, Italy.
Alice SerafiniLocal Health Authority, Modena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7396-2839
Samantha PegoraroItalian Climate Network, Milano, Italy.
Raymond AgiusCentre for Occupational and Environmental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Ariana ZekaInstitute of Environment, Health and Societies, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UK Ariana.Zeka@brunel.ac.uk paolo.lauriola@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9570-8831

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, it has become clear that primary healthcare systems play a critical role in clinical care, such as patient screening, triage, physical and psychological support and also in promoting good community advice and awareness in coordination with secondary healthcare and preventive care. Because of the role of social and environmental factors in COVID-19 transmission and burden of disease, it is essential to ensure that there is adequate coordination of population-based health services and public health interventions. The COVID-19 pandemic has shown the primary and community healthcare (P&CHC) system's weaknesses worldwide. In many instances, P&CHC played only a minor role, the emphasis being on hospital and intensive care beds. This was compounded by political failures, in supporting local community resilience. Placing community building, social cohesion and resilience at the forefront of dealing with the COVID-19 crisis can help align solutions that provide a vision of 'planetary health'. This can be achieved by involving local well-being and participation in the face of any pervasive health and environmental crisis, including other epidemics and large-scale ecological crises. This paper proposes that P&CHC should take on two critical roles: first, to support local problem-solving efforts and to serve as a partner in innovative approaches to safeguarding community well-being; and second, to understand the local environment and health risks in the context of the global health perspective. We see this as an opportunity of immediate value and broad consequence beyond the control of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

Community Health ServicesPublic HealthClimate ChangeCOVID-19EducationGlobal HealthHumansPoliticsSARS-CoV-2Socioeconomic Factorsenvironmental healthhealth policyhealth systemsprevention strategiespublic health

Identifiers

PMID33692145
PMCPMC7948151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.