ArticleBMJ case reports2021
Rare case of rapidly reaccumulating ascites.
Article in BMJ case reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Eosinophilic ascites is a rare type of exudative ascites most commonly caused by eosinophilic gastroenteritis. Here, a 57-year-old man presents with sudden-onset abdominal distension associated with nausea, vomiting and decreased appetite for 10 days. Physical examination revealed significant abdominal distention and fluid wave. Initial labs showed leucocytosis and mild peripheral eosinophilia. Imaging of his abdomen revealed severe ascites, no features of cirrhosis and diffuse inflammatory changes involving the jejunum and ileum. Diagnostic paracentesis showed exudative, ascitic fluid with predominant eosinophilia. Cytology of the ascitic fluid and blind biopsies taken during oesophagogastroduodenoscopy and enteroscopy were both negative for malignancy. The ascites reaccumulated rapidly, requiring five rounds of large-volume paracentesis during hospitalisation. Empiric treatment for suspected eosinophilic gastroenteritis with intravenous steroids improved and stabilised the patient's ascites for discharge. Parasitic workup resulted positively for
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.