Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33691983›Full record

ReviewJournal of pediatric urology2021

Individualized care for patients with intersex (differences of sex development): part 4/5.Considering the Ifs, Whens, and Whats regarding sexual-reproductive system surgery.

Kanthi Bangalore Krishna, Barry A Kogan, Tom Mazur, Piet Hoebeke, Guy Bogaert, Peter A Lee

Open access · bronzeAbstract readCase ReportsReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pediatric urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of differences of sex development in Japan.Clinical pediatric endocrinology : case reports and clinical investigations : official journal of the Japanese Society for Pediatric Endocrinology · 2026
    Review
  3. Differences of sex development.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Kanthi Bangalore KrishnaPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA. Electronic address: kbangalorekrishna@pennstatehealth.psu.edu.
Barry A KoganAlbany Medical Center, Albany, NY 12208, USA.
Tom MazurUniversity of Buffalo, NY, USA.
Piet HoebekeUniversity Hospital, Gent, Belgium.
Guy BogaertUniversity Hospital, UZLeuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Peter A LeePenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA.
Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center · USAlbany Medical Center Hospital · USGhent University Hospital · BEUniversitair Ziekenhuis Leuven · BEUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Issues and concerns regarding surgery of the sexual-reproductive anatomy during infancy and early childhood are discussed using four actual examples. A case of a 46, XX infant with 21 hydroxylase deficiency congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) with atypical (ambiguous) genitalia is discussed regarding timing and potential harms and benefits of surgery. We present the perspective of balancing the child's rights to bodily autonomy and right to an open future versus parents' decision making authority regarding what they perceive as their child's future best interests. The second case is a newborn with complete androgen insensitivity syndrome and we discuss the harms, benefits and timing of gonadectomy. The third case examines the physical and psychological impact of penile shaft hypospadias, raising the question of whether surgery is justified to prevent what may or may not be considered a permanent disability. The fourth case involves an adult woman with classic CAH, born with a urogenital sinus and clitoromegaly, who never had genital surgery and is now requesting vaginoplasty, but not clitoral reduction. The primary message of this article, as the previous articles in this series, is to encourage patient-family centered care that individualizes treatment guided by shared decision making.

Indexed as

Adrenal Hyperplasia, CongenitalDisorders of Sex DevelopmentAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGenitalia, FemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleSexual DevelopmentUrogenital Surgical ProceduresComplete androgen insensitivity syndromeCongenital adrenal hyperplasiaDifferences of sex developmentGender assignmentGenital surgeryVaginoplasty

Identifiers

PMID33691983
OpenAlexW3130052864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.