Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33691716›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2021

In vivo calibration of the T2* cardiovascular magnetic resonance method at 1.5 T for estimation of cardiac iron in a minipig model of transfusional iron overload.

Peter Diedrich Jensen, Asbjørn Haaning Nielsen, Carsten Wiberg Simonsen, Ulrik Thorngren Baandrup, Svend Eggert Jensen, Martin Bøgsted, Sigridur Olga Magnusdottir, Anne Birthe Helweg Jensen, Benedict Kjaergaard

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Extracts ofChinese herbal medicines · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Peter Diedrich JensenDepartment of Hematology, Aalborg University Hospital, PO box 365, 9100, Aalborg, Denmark. d222615@dadlnet.dk.ORCID 0000-0003-3134-3973
Asbjørn Haaning NielsenDepartment of the Built Environment, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Carsten Wiberg SimonsenDepartment of Radiology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Ulrik Thorngren BaandrupCentre for Clinical Research, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjoerring, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Svend Eggert JensenDepartment of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Martin BøgstedDepartment of Hematology, Aalborg University Hospital, PO box 365, 9100, Aalborg, Denmark.
Sigridur Olga MagnusdottirBiomedical Research Laboratory, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Anne Birthe Helweg JensenThe Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Benedict KjaergaardBiomedical Research Laboratory, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Aalborg University Hospital · DKAalborg University · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-invasive estimation of the cardiac iron concentration (CIC) by T2* cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has been validated repeatedly and is in widespread clinical use. However, calibration data are limited, and mostly from post-mortem studies. In the present study, we performed an in vivo calibration in a dextran-iron loaded minipig model.

methodsR2* (= 1/T2*) was assessed in vivo by 1.5 T CMR in the cardiac septum. Chemical CIC was assessed by inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy in endomyocardial catheter biopsies (EMBs) from cardiac septum taken during follow up of 11 minipigs on dextran-iron loading, and also in full-wall biopsies from cardiac septum, taken post-mortem in another 16  minipigs, after completed iron loading.

resultsA strong correlation could be demonstrated between chemical CIC in 55 EMBs and parallel cardiac T2* (Spearman rank correlation coefficient 0.72, P < 0.001). Regression analysis led to [CIC] = (R2* - 17.16)/41.12 for the calibration equation with CIC in mg/g dry weight and R2* in Hz. An even stronger correlation was found, when chemical CIC was measured by full-wall biopsies from cardiac septum, taken immediately after euthanasia, in connection with the last CMR session after finished iron loading (Spearman rank correlation coefficient 0.95 (P < 0.001). Regression analysis led to the calibration equation [CIC] = (R2* - 17.2)/31.8.

conclusionsCalibration of cardiac T2* by EMBs is possible in the minipig model but is less accurate than by full-wall biopsies. Likely explanations are sampling error, variable content of non-iron containing tissue and smaller biopsies, when using catheter biopsies. The results further validate the CMR T2* technique for estimation of cardiac iron in conditions with iron overload and add to the limited calibration data published earlier.

Indexed as

Blood TransfusionMagnetic Resonance ImagingAnimalsBiopsyCalibrationCardiomyopathiesDisease Models, AnimalFemaleHemosiderosisIronMyocardiumPredictive Value of TestsSpectrophotometry, AtomicSwineSwine, MiniatureIronCardiac ironCardiosiderosisDextran-iron loadingMinipig modelT2* calibrationT2* cardiovascular magnetic resonance

Identifiers

PMID33691716
PMCPMC7948337
OpenAlexW3135638666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.