Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33691693›Full record

ArticleBMC medical genomics2021

Whole-exome sequencing in 168 Korean patients with inherited retinal degeneration.

Dae Joong Ma, Hyun-Seob Lee, Kwangsoo Kim, Seongmin Choi, Insoon Jang, Seo-Ho Cho, Chang Ki Yoon, Eun Kyoung Lee, Hyeong Gon Yu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical genomics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genetic characterization of inherited retinal dystrophy in a Northwestern Chinese cohort: A single-center study over a 5-year period in Shaanxi, China.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Genes · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Dae Joong MaRetinal Degeneration Research Lab, Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyun-Seob LeeGenomics Core Facility, Translational Research Institute, Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kwangsoo KimTransdisciplinary Department of Medicine and Advanced Technology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seongmin ChoiBiomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Insoon JangBiomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seo-Ho ChoBiomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Chang Ki YoonRetinal Degeneration Research Lab, Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Eun Kyoung LeeRetinal Degeneration Research Lab, Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyeong Gon YuRetinal Degeneration Research Lab, Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea. hgonyu@snu.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0002-1795-202X
Seoul National University Hospital · KRSeoul National University · KR

Funding

Ministry of Health and Welfare HI14C1277Seoul National University Hospital 2620170060
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo date, no genetic analysis of inherited retinal disease (IRD) using whole-exome sequencing (WES) has been conducted in a large-scale Korean cohort. The aim of this study was to characterise the genetic profile of IRD patients in Korea using WES.

methodsWe performed comprehensive molecular testing in 168 unrelated Korean IRD patients using WES. The potential pathogenicity of candidate variants was assessed using the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology variant interpretation guidelines, in silico prediction tools, published literature, and compatibility with known phenotypes or inheritance patterns.

resultsCausative variants were detected in 86/168 (51.2%) IRD patients, including 58/107 (54.2%) with retinitis pigmentosa, 7/15 (46.7%) with cone and cone-rod dystrophy, 2/3 (66.6%) with Usher syndrome, 1/2 (50.0%) with congenital stationary night blindness, 2/2 (100.0%) with Leber congenital amaurosis, 1/1 (100.0%) with Bietti crystalline dystrophy, 1/1 (100.0%) with Joubert syndrome, 9/10 (90.0%) with Stargardt macular dystrophy, 1/10 (10.0%) with vitelliform macular dystrophy, 1/11 (9.1%) with other forms of macular dystrophy, and 3/4 (75.0%) with choroideraemia. USH2A, ABCA4, and EYS were the most common causative genes associated with IRD. For retinitis pigmentosa, variants of USH2A and EYS were the most common causative gene mutations.

conclusionsThis study demonstrated the distribution of causative genetic mutations in Korean IRD patients. The data will serve as a reference for future genetic screening and development of treatment modalities for Korean IRD patients.

Indexed as

Exome SequencingRetinal DegenerationAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutationRepublic of KoreaYoung AdultInherited retinal degenerationRetinitis pigmentosaWhole-exome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID33691693
PMCPMC7945660
OpenAlexW3119002244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.