Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33691684›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2021

Scale-up and sustainability of a personalized end-of-life care intervention: a longitudinal mixed-methods study.

Alyson Takaoka, Benjamin Tam, Meredith Vanstone, France J Clarke, Neala Hoad, Marilyn Swinton, Feli Toledo, Anne Boyle, Anne Woods, Erick H Duan and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Alyson Takaoka *Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Benjamin Tam *Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Meredith VanstoneDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
France J ClarkeDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Neala HoadDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, 50 Charlton Avenue East, Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 4A6, Canada.
Marilyn SwintonDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Feli ToledoDepartment of Spiritual Care, St Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Anne BoyleDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Anne WoodsDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Erick H DuanDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Diane Heels-AnsdellDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Lily WaughDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, 50 Charlton Avenue East, Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 4A6, Canada.
Mark SothDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Jill RudkowskiDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Waleed AlhazzaniDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Dan PerriDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Tania LigoriDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, 50 Charlton Avenue East, Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 4A6, Canada.
Roman JaeschkeDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Nicole ZytarukDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Deborah J CookDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. debcook@mcmaster.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1442-080X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundScaling-up and sustaining healthcare interventions can be challenging. Our objective was to describe how the 3 Wishes Project (3WP), a personalized end-of-life intervention, was scaled-up and sustained in an intensive care unit (ICU).

methodsIn a longitudinal mixed-methods study from January 12,013 - December 31, 2018, dying patients and families were invited to participate if the probability of patient death was > 95% or after a decision to withdraw life support. A research team member or bedside clinician learned more about each of the patients and their family, then elicited and implemented at least 3 personalized wishes for patients and/or family members. We used a qualitative descriptive approach to analyze interviews and focus groups conducted with 25 clinicians who cared for the enrolled patients. We used descriptive statistics to summarize patient, wish, and clinician characteristics, and analyzed outcome data in quarters using Statistical Process Control charts. The primary outcome was enrollment of terminally ill patients and respective families; the secondary outcome was the number of wishes per patient; tertiary outcomes included wish features and stakeholder involvement.

resultsBoth qualitative and quantitative analyses suggested a three-phase approach to the scale-up of this intervention during which 369 dying patients were enrolled, having 2039 terminal wishes implemented. From a research project to clinical program to an approach to practice, we documented a three-fold increase in enrolment with a five-fold increase in total wishes implemented, without a change in cost. Beginning as a study, the protocol provided structure; starting gradually enabled frontline staff to experience and recognize the value of acts of compassion for patients, families, and clinicians. The transition to a clinical program was marked by handover from the research staff to bedside staff, whereby project catalysts mentored project champions to create staff partnerships, and family engagement became more intentional. The final transition involved empowering staff to integrate the program as an approach to care, expanding it within and beyond the organization.

conclusionsThe 3WP is an end-of-life intervention which was implemented as a study, scaled-up into a clinical program, and sustained by becoming integrated into practice as an approach to care.

Indexed as

Hospice CareTerminal CareFamilyFocus GroupsHumansIntensive Care UnitsCritical careDeathDyingPalliative careQuality improvementScale-upSpiritual careSustainability

Identifiers

PMID33691684
PMCPMC7944608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.