Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33691683›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2021

How well do documented goals-of-care discussions for patients with stage IV cancer reflect communication best practices?

Natalie C Ernecoff, Kathryn L Wessell, William A Wood, Gary S Winzelberg, Frances A Collichio, Laura C Hanson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Natalie C ErnecoffDepartment of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 3600 Forbes Avenue, 405.35 Iroquois Building, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA. Ernecoff.natalie@pitt.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4753-8492
Kathryn L WessellSheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA.
William A WoodDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA.
Gary S WinzelbergDepartment of Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine and Palliative Care Program, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA.
Frances A CollichioDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA.
Laura C HansonSheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWritten clinical communication regarding patients' disease understanding and values may facilitate goal-concordant care, yet little is known about the quality of electronic health record (EHR) documentation. We sought to (1) describe frequency of communication best practices in EHR-documented goals-of-care discussions, and (2) assess whether templated notes improve quality of documentation.

methodsResearchers pulled text of EHR-documented goals-of-care discussions for hospitalized patients with Stage IV cancer from admission to 60-days follow-up. Text was included when in a single encounter the clinician addressed: (a) prognosis and/or illness understanding; and (b) goals and/or treatment options. Researchers qualitatively coded text based on guidelines for communication best practices, and noted if an EHR template was used.

resultsForty-two percent (206/492) of patients had EHR-documented goals-of-care discussions. Text frequently described communication of cancer progression (89%), though rarely included prognosis (22%). Text often included patients' goals and values (83%), and at least on specific treatment decision (82%). Communication about treatments was included for 98% of patients; common examples included cancer treatment (62%), hospice (62%), resuscitation (51%), or intensive care (38%). Clinicians documented making recommendations for 40% of patients. Text addressing patient emotional and spiritual concerns was uncommon (15%). Compared to free text, use of a template was associated with increased documentation of goals and values (80% vs. 61%, p < 0.01), but not other best practices.

conclusionInsights from the study can be used to guide future training and research to study and improve the quality of documentation about goal of care, and its impact on goal-concordant care.

Indexed as

GoalsNeoplasmsCommunicationDocumentationElectronic Health RecordsHumansDecision makingElectronic health recordMetastaticPalliative care

Identifiers

PMID33691683
PMCPMC7944465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.