Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33691668›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2021

Acute day units for mental health crises: a qualitative study of service user and staff views and experiences.

Nicola Morant, Michael Davidson, Jane Wackett, Danielle Lamb, Vanessa Pinfold, Deb Smith, Sonia Johnson, Brynmor Lloyd-Evans, David P J Osborn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Acute psychiatric care: approaches to increasing the range of services and improving access and quality of care.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nicola MorantDivision of Psychiatry, UCL, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK. n.morant@ucl.ac.uk.
Michael DavidsonDivision of Psychiatry, UCL, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.
Jane WackettMcPin Foundation, 7-14 Great Dover St, London, SE1 4YR, UK.
Danielle LambDepartment of Applied Health Research, UCL, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK.
Vanessa PinfoldMcPin Foundation, 7-14 Great Dover St, London, SE1 4YR, UK.
Deb SmithMcPin Foundation, 7-14 Great Dover St, London, SE1 4YR, UK.
Sonia JohnsonDivision of Psychiatry, UCL, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.
Brynmor Lloyd-EvansDivision of Psychiatry, UCL, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.
David P J OsbornDivision of Psychiatry, UCL, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.
University College London · GBMcPin Foundation · GBCamden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute Day Units (ADUs) provide intensive, non-residential, short-term treatment for adults in mental health crisis. They currently exist in approximately 30% of health localities in England, but there is little research into their functioning or effectiveness, and how this form of crisis care is experienced by service users. This qualitative study explores the views and experiences of stakeholders who use and work in ADUs.

methodsWe conducted 36 semi-structured interviews with service users, staff and carers at four ADUs in England. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Peer researchers collected data and contributed to analysis, and a Lived Experience Advisory Panel (LEAP) provided perspectives across the whole project.

resultsBoth service users and staff provided generally positive accounts of using or working in ADUs. Valued features were structured programmes that provide routine, meaningful group activities, and opportunities for peer contact and emotional, practical and peer support, within an environment that felt safe. Aspects of ADU care were often described as enabling personal and social connections that contribute to shifting from crisis to recovery. ADUs were compared favourably to other forms of home- and hospital-based acute care, particularly in providing more therapeutic input and social contact. Some service users and staff thought ADU lengths of stay should be extended slightly, and staff described some ADUs being under-utilised or poorly-understood by referrers in local acute care systems.

conclusionsMulti-site qualitative data suggests that ADUs provide a distinctive and valued contribution to acute care systems, and can avoid known problems associated with other forms of acute care, such as low user satisfaction, stressful ward environments, and little therapeutic input or positive peer contact. Findings suggest there may be grounds for recommending further development and more widespread implementation of ADUs to increase choice and effective support within local acute care systems.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersMental Health ServicesAdultCaregiversEnglandHumansMental HealthQualitative ResearchAcute careAcute day unitAlternative to admissionCrisis careMental healthPsychiatryQualitativeService usersSevere mental illness

Identifiers

PMID33691668
PMCPMC7944597
OpenAlexW3108787434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.