Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33691625›Full record

ArticleBMC ecology and evolution2021

Gut microbiota in two recently diverged passerine species: evaluating the effects of species identity, habitat use and geographic distance.

Camille Sottas, Lucie Schmiedová, Jakub Kreisinger, Tomáš Albrecht, Jiří Reif, Tomasz S Osiejuk, Radka Reifová

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ecology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Comparative Analysis of How the Fecal Microbiota of Green-Winged Saltator (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  10. Bacterial communities along parrot digestive and respiratory tracts: the effects of sample type, species and time.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Camille SottasDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, 128 44, Prague, Czech Republic. camille.sottas@gmail.com.
Lucie SchmiedováDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, 128 44, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jakub KreisingerDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, 128 44, Prague, Czech Republic.
Tomáš AlbrechtDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, 128 44, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jiří ReifFaculty of Science, Institute for Environmental Studies, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Tomasz S OsiejukDepartment of Behavioural Ecology, Institute of Environmental Biology, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland.
Radka ReifováDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, 128 44, Prague, Czech Republic.
Charles University · CZAdam Mickiewicz University in Poznań · PLPalacký University Olomouc · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt has been proposed that divergence in the gut microbiota composition between incipient species could contribute to their reproductive isolation. Nevertheless, empirical evidence for the role of gut microbiota in speciation is scarce. Moreover, it is still largely unknown to what extent closely related species in the early stages of speciation differ in their gut microbiota composition, especially in non-mammalian taxa, and which factors drive the divergence. Here we analysed the gut microbiota in two closely related passerine species, the common nightingale (Luscinia megarhynchos) and the thrush nightingale (Luscinia luscinia). The ranges of these two species overlap in a secondary contact zone, where both species occasionally hybridize and where interspecific competition has resulted in habitat use differentiation.

resultsWe analysed the gut microbiota from the proximal, middle and distal part of the small intestine in both sympatric and allopatric populations of the two nightingale species using sequencing of bacterial 16S rRNA. We found small but significant differences in the microbiota composition among the three gut sections. However, the gut microbiota composition in the two nightingale species did not differ significantly between either sympatric or allopatric populations. Most of the observed variation in the gut microbiota composition was explained by inter-individual differences.

conclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the first attempt to assess the potential role of the gut microbiota in bird speciation. Our results suggest that neither habitat use, nor geographical distance, nor species identity have strong influence on the nightingale gut microbiota composition. This suggests that changes in the gut microbiota composition are unlikely to contribute to reproductive isolation in these passerine birds.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeSongbirdsAnimalsEcosystemRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSympatryRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDietGut microbiomeHabitat useLusciniaPasserinesReproductive isolation

Identifiers

PMID33691625
PMCPMC7948333
OpenAlexW3134628173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.