ArticleBMC ecology and evolution2021
Gut microbiota in two recently diverged passerine species: evaluating the effects of species identity, habitat use and geographic distance.
Article in BMC ecology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetic Links to Gut Microbiome Variation in the Yellow-Rumped Warbler Hybrid Zone.Molecular ecology · 2026Article
- A microbial view on secondary contact between two Alpine butterflies.BMC ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Subspecific variation in gut microbiota of North American bison in a sympatric setting reveals differentially abundant taxa.Animal microbiome · 2025Article
- Review of the mechanisms of the biliary-enteric axis in the development of cholangiocarcinoma.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Advanced Membrane Simulations in Probiotics and Gut Microbiome Interaction Research: The Current Trends and Insights.Current pharmaceutical design · 2025Review
- Annual cycle variations in the gut microbiota of migratory black-necked cranes.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Gut-lung axis in allergic asthma: microbiota-driven immune dysregulation and therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- The gut microbiota of three avian species living in sympatry.BMC ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Comparative Analysis of How the Fecal Microbiota of Green-Winged Saltator (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Bacterial communities along parrot digestive and respiratory tracts: the effects of sample type, species and time.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2024Article
- Temporal Variations in the Gut Microbiota of the Globally Endangered Sichuan Partridge (Arborophila rufipectus): Implications for Adaptation to Seasonal Dietary Change and Conservation.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2023Article
- Is Habitat More Important than Phylogenetic Relatedness for Elucidating the Gut Bacterial Composition in Sister Lizard Species?Microbes and environments · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIt has been proposed that divergence in the gut microbiota composition between incipient species could contribute to their reproductive isolation. Nevertheless, empirical evidence for the role of gut microbiota in speciation is scarce. Moreover, it is still largely unknown to what extent closely related species in the early stages of speciation differ in their gut microbiota composition, especially in non-mammalian taxa, and which factors drive the divergence. Here we analysed the gut microbiota in two closely related passerine species, the common nightingale (Luscinia megarhynchos) and the thrush nightingale (Luscinia luscinia). The ranges of these two species overlap in a secondary contact zone, where both species occasionally hybridize and where interspecific competition has resulted in habitat use differentiation.
resultsWe analysed the gut microbiota from the proximal, middle and distal part of the small intestine in both sympatric and allopatric populations of the two nightingale species using sequencing of bacterial 16S rRNA. We found small but significant differences in the microbiota composition among the three gut sections. However, the gut microbiota composition in the two nightingale species did not differ significantly between either sympatric or allopatric populations. Most of the observed variation in the gut microbiota composition was explained by inter-individual differences.
conclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the first attempt to assess the potential role of the gut microbiota in bird speciation. Our results suggest that neither habitat use, nor geographical distance, nor species identity have strong influence on the nightingale gut microbiota composition. This suggests that changes in the gut microbiota composition are unlikely to contribute to reproductive isolation in these passerine birds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.