Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33691521›Full record

ArticleLaboratory animals2021

Anaesthesia of laboratory, aquaculture and ornamental fish: Proceedings of the first LASA-FVS Symposium.

Paul Schroeder, Richard Lloyd, Robin McKimm, Matthijs Metselaar, Jorge Navarro, Martin O'Farrell, Gareth D Readman, Lars Speilberg, Jean-Philippe Mocho

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Laboratory animals, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Paul SchroederDepartment of Biomedical Services, University of Oxford, UK.
Richard LloydCentre for Sustainable Aquatic Research, Swansea University, UK.
Robin McKimmElectrofishing Services Ltd, UK.
Matthijs MetselaarBenchmark Animal Health Ltd, UK.
Jorge NavarroPHARMAQ, UK.
Martin O'FarrellAztec Management Consultants, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9479-9922
Gareth D ReadmanConservation Welfare and Engagement Department, SEA LIFE, UK.
Lars SpeilbergScanvacc AS, Norway.
Jean-Philippe MochoJoint Production System Ltd, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4895-6867
Benchmark Animal Health (United Kingdom) · GBScanVacc (Norway) · NOSwansea University · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following on from the Annual Fish Veterinary Society Conference, this symposium was organised with the Laboratory Animal Science Association and brought together experts from ornamental (pond and aquarium) fish practice, aquaculture and aquatic-research facilities to discuss good practice of anaesthesia. This proceedings paper gives an overview of relevant experiences involving a range of immersion drugs including tricaine, benzocaine and isoeugenol, as well as a summary of the main topics of discussion. While fish anaesthesia is commonplace, administration methods, drugs and monitoring procedures may often be regarded as antiquated when compared with mammalian practice. These limitations notwithstanding, individual fish will benefit from good anaesthetic monitoring. Although the most common anaesthetic drugs may be perceived as equally efficacious and therefore interchangeable for different settings, challenges are different for the anaesthesia of grouped fish, when determining species-dependent anaesthetic dosing in a multi-species tank, or adapting to farming requirements, nationally licensed products, costs and withdrawal periods. The fish anaesthetic arsenal fails to address premedication, analgesia and issues of averseness. The two latter factors should be part of the evaluation of anaesthetic protocols; therefore, instructions for the analgesic provision of lidocaine to fin clipped zebrafish are proposed. Euthanasia practices could sometimes be refined too. Alternative physical methods such as electrical stunning are options to be considered.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaZebrafishAnimalsAquacultureLaboratoriesLipidsN-Acetylneuraminic Acidlipid-associated sialic acidLipidsN-Acetylneuraminic Acidanaesthesiaanalgesiaelectrical stunningeuthanasiaFishzebrafish

Identifiers

PMID33691521
PMCPMC8366193
OpenAlexW3134677994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.