Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33691088›Full record

ArticleAnnals of epidemiology2021

Regional and socioeconomic predictors of perceived ability to access coronavirus testing in the United States: results from a nationwide online COVID-19 survey.

Shahmir H Ali, Yesim Tozan, Abbey M Jones, Joshua Foreman, Ariadna Capasso, Ralph J DiClemente

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of epidemiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Separating signal from noise in wastewater data: An algorithm to identify community-level COVID-19 surges in real time.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Socio-economic deprivation and COVID-19 in Germany.Scandinavian journal of public health · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shahmir H AliDepartment of Social & Behavioral Sciences, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY.
Yesim TozanGlobal Health Program, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY.
Abbey M JonesDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY.
Joshua ForemanDepartment of Social & Behavioral Sciences, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY; Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Ariadna CapassoDepartment of Social & Behavioral Sciences, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY.
Ralph J DiClementeDepartment of Social & Behavioral Sciences, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY. Electronic address: rjd438@nyu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAccess to COVID-19 testing remained a salient issue during the early months of the pandemic, therefore this study aimed to identify 1) regional and 2) socioeconomic predictors of perceived ability to access Coronavirus testing.

methodsAn online survey using social media-based advertising was conducted among U.S. adults in April 2020. Participants were asked whether they thought they could acquire a COVID-19 test, along with basic demographic, socioeconomic and geographic information.

resultsA total of 6,378 participants provided data on perceived access to COVID-19 testing. In adjusted analyses, we found higher income and possession of health insurance to be associated with perceived ability to access Coronavirus testing. Geographically, perceived access was highest (68%) in East South Central division and lowest (39%) in West North Central. Disparities in health insurance coverage did not directly correspond to disparities in perceived access to COVID-19 testing.

conclusionsSex, geographic location, income, and insurance status were associated with perceived access to COVID-19 testing; interventions aimed at improving either access or awareness of measures taken to improve access are warranted. These findings from the pandemic's early months shed light on the importance of disaggregating perceived and true access to screening during such crises.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 TestingAdultHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatescoronavirusCOVID-19disparitiesgeographicSocio-economicTesting

Identifiers

PMID33691088
PMCPMC7937327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.