Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33690987›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2021

Intrathecal pain management with ziconotide: Time for consensus?

Georgios Matis, Pasquale De Negri, Denis Dupoiron, Rudolf Likar, Xander Zuidema, Dirk Rasche

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Molecular Insights into the Marine GastropodInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Neuropathic pain; what we know and what we should do about it.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Georgios MatisDepartment of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1046-2829
Pasquale De NegriDepartment of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, San Giuliano Hospital, Giugliano, Naples, Italy.
Denis DupoironAnesthesiology and Pain Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, ICO Paul Papin, Angers, France.
Rudolf LikarDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Klagenfurt Clinic, Klagenfurt, Austria.
Xander ZuidemaDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht/Zeist, Zeist, The Netherlands.
Dirk RascheFunctional Neurosurgery and Neurosurgical Pain Therapy, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany.
Diakonessenhuis hospital · NLGiuliani (Italy) · ITInstitut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest · FRKlinikum Klagenfurt · ATUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DEUniversity of Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article summarizes recommendations made by six pain specialists who discussed the rationale for ziconotide intrathecal analgesia (ITA) and the requirement for evidence-based guidance on its use, from a European perspective. Riemser Pharma GmbH (Greifswald, Germany), which holds the European marketing authorization for ziconotide, hosted the meeting. The group agreed that ITA is under-used in Europe, adding that ziconotide ITA has potential to be a first-line alternative to morphine; both are already first-line options in the USA. Ziconotide ITA (initiated using a low-dose, slow-titration approach) is suitable for many patients with noncancer- or cancer-related chronic refractory pain and no history of psychosis. Adopting ziconotide as first-line ITA could reduce opioid usage in these patient populations. The group advocated a risk-reduction strategy for all candidate patients, including compulsory prescreening for neuropsychosis, and requested US-European alignment of the licensed starting dose for ziconotide: the low-and-slow approach practiced in the USA has a better tolerability profile than the fixed high starting dose licensed in Europe. Of note, an update to the European Summary of Product Characteristics is anticipated in early 2021. The group acknowledged that the Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference (PACC) treatment algorithms for ziconotide ITA provide useful guidance, but recommendations tailored specifically for European settings are required. Before a consensus process can formally begin, the group called for additional European prospective studies to investigate ziconotide in low-and-slow dosing strategies, in different patient settings. Such data would enable European guidance to have the most appropriate evidence at its core.

Indexed as

Analgesics, Non-NarcoticPain ManagementEuropeGermanyHumansInjections, Spinalomega-ConotoxinsProspective StudiesAnalgesics, Non-Narcoticomega-Conotoxinsziconotidecancer painchronic painconsensusintrathecal therapypain managementziconotide

Identifiers

PMID33690987
PMCPMC7943290
OpenAlexW3135115122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.