Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33690905›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2021

Quantitative imaging metrics derived from magnetic resonance fingerprinting using ISMRM/NIST MRI system phantom: An international multicenter repeatability and reproducibility study.

Amaresha Shridhar Konar, Enlin Qian, Sairam Geethanath, Guido Buonincontri, Nancy A Obuchowski, Maggie Fung, Pedro Gomez, Rolf Schulte, Matteo Cencini, Michela Tosetti and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Irradiation-induced modulation of TRadiological physics and technology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Simultaneous multislice cardiac multimapping based on locally low-rank and sparsity constraints.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Amaresha Shridhar KonarDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Enlin QianColumbia Magnetic Resonance Research Center, Columbia University in the City of New York, New York, NY, 10027, USA.
Sairam GeethanathColumbia Magnetic Resonance Research Center, Columbia University in the City of New York, New York, NY, 10027, USA.
Guido BuonincontriImago7 Foundation and IRCCS Stella Maris Foundation, Pisa, PI, 56128, Italy.
Nancy A ObuchowskiDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Maggie FungGE Healthcare, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Pedro GomezMunich School of Bioengineering, Technical University of Munich, Munich, BY, 85748, Germany.
Rolf SchulteGE Healthcare, Munich, BY, 80807, Germany.
Matteo CenciniImago7 Foundation and IRCCS Stella Maris Foundation, Pisa, PI, 56128, Italy.
Michela TosettiImago7 Foundation and IRCCS Stella Maris Foundation, Pisa, PI, 56128, Italy.
Lawrence H SchwartzDepartment of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Amita Shukla-DaveDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Fondazione Stella Maris · ITGeneral Electric (Spain) · ESMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USResonance Research (United States) · USCleveland Clinic · USNewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USTechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Quantitative imaging tools to derive DW-MRI oncological biomarkersU01CA211205 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI DAVE, AMITA, SCHWARTZ, LAWRENCE H · 2017 to 2021
$3.4M
GE Healthcare-Columbia Radiology MR Research Partnership ProgramNCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS U01 CA211205NIH HHS U01 CA211205
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the bias and inherent reliability of the quantitative (T

methodISMRM/NIST MRI system phantom provides standard reference T

resultFor the wide ranges of MRF estimated T

conclusionThis study shows that MRF is highly repeatable (wCV <4% for T

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyPhantoms, ImagingReproducibility of Resultsmulticenter studyquantitative imaging biomarkerquantitative MRIrepeatabilityreproducibilityT1 and T2 relaxation

Identifiers

PMID33690905
PMCPMC9284672
OpenAlexW3134812968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.