Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33690794›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2021

Why do people oppose mask wearing? A comprehensive analysis of U.S. tweets during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Lu He, Changyang He, Tera L Reynolds, Qiushi Bai, Yicong Huang, Chen Li, Kai Zheng, Yunan Chen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
26.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Ideological Consistency and News Sharing as Predictors of Masking Among College Students.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lu HeDepartment of Informatics, Donald Bren School of Information and Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0181-018X
Changyang HeDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Tera L ReynoldsDepartment of Informatics, Donald Bren School of Information and Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.
Qiushi BaiDepartment of Computer Science, Donald Bren School of Information and Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.
Yicong HuangDepartment of Computer Science, Donald Bren School of Information and Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.
Chen LiDepartment of Computer Science, Donald Bren School of Information and Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.
Kai ZhengDepartment of Informatics, Donald Bren School of Information and Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.
Yunan ChenDepartment of Informatics, Donald Bren School of Information and Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.
University of California, Irvine · USHong Kong University of Science and Technology · HK

Funding

University of California Health Participation in the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C)UL1TR001414 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI COOPER, DAN M, VILAIN, ERIC J. · 2015 to 2023
$35.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001414NCRR NIH HHSNIH HHSNIH HHS UL1TR001414NSF RAPID award 2027254Orange County Health Care Agency
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveFacial masks are an essential personal protective measure to fight the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease) pandemic. However, the mask adoption rate in the United States is still less than optimal. This study aims to understand the beliefs held by individuals who oppose the use of facial masks, and the evidence that they use to support these beliefs, to inform the development of targeted public health communication strategies. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe analyzed a total of 771 268 U.S.-based tweets between January to October 2020. We developed machine learning classifiers to identify and categorize relevant tweets, followed by a qualitative content analysis of a subset of the tweets to understand the rationale of those opposed mask wearing.

resultsWe identified 267 152 tweets that contained personal opinions about wearing facial masks to prevent the spread of COVID-19. While the majority of the tweets supported mask wearing, the proportion of anti-mask tweets stayed constant at about a 10% level throughout the study period. Common reasons for opposition included physical discomfort and negative effects, lack of effectiveness, and being unnecessary or inappropriate for certain people or under certain circumstances. The opposing tweets were significantly less likely to cite external sources of information such as public health agencies' websites to support the arguments.

conclusionsCombining machine learning and qualitative content analysis is an effective strategy for identifying public attitudes toward mask wearing and the reasons for opposition. The results may inform better communication strategies to improve the public perception of wearing masks and, in particular, to specifically address common anti-mask beliefs.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthMachine LearningMasksSocial MediaCOVID-19HumansPublic OpinionUnited Statescoronavirus [B04.820.504.540.150]health communication [L01.143.350]machine learning [G17.035.250.500]masks [E07.325.877.500]Natural Language Processing [L01.224.050.375.580]personal protective equipment [E07.700.560]public health [H02.403.720]social media [L01.178.751]

Identifiers

PMID33690794
PMCPMC7989302
OpenAlexW3134403479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.