Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33690708›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2021

Rebuild the Academy: Supporting academic mothers during COVID-19 and beyond.

Robinson W Fulweiler, Sarah W Davies, Jennifer F Biddle, Amy J Burgin, Emily H G Cooperdock, Torrance C Hanley, Carly D Kenkel, Amy M Marcarelli, Catherine M Matassa, Talea L Mayo and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
27.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Ten simple rules for a mom-friendly Academia.PLoS computational biology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.

Robinson W FulweilerDepartments of Earth and Environment, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Sarah W DaviesDepartment of Biology, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1620-2278
Jennifer F BiddleSchool of Marine Science and Policy, University of Delaware, Lewes, Delaware, United States of America.
Amy J BurginDepartment of Environmental Studies and Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Kansas Biological Survey, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, United States of America.
Emily H G CooperdockDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0154-8719
Torrance C HanleyMarine Science Center, Northeastern University, Nahant, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1306-8189
Carly D KenkelDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Amy M MarcarelliDepartment of Biological Sciences, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, Michigan, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4175-9211
Catherine M MatassaDepartment of Marine Sciences, University of Connecticut, Groton, Connecticut, United States of America.
Talea L MayoDepartment of Mathematics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7921-871X
Lory Z Santiago-VàzquezDepartment of Biology and Biotechnology, University of Houston-Clear Lake, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Nikki Traylor-KnowlesRosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4906-4537
Maren ZieglerDepartment of Animal Ecology and Systematics, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2237-9261
Boston University · USUniversity of Southern California · USEmory University · USJustus-Liebig-Universität Gießen · DEMichigan Technological University · USNortheastern University · USUniversity of Connecticut · USUniversity of Delaware · USUniversity of Houston - Clear Lake · USUniversity of Kansas · USUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The issues facing academic mothers have been discussed for decades. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is further exposing these inequalities as womxn scientists who are parenting while also engaging in a combination of academic related duties are falling behind. These inequities can be solved by investing strategically in solutions. Here we describe strategies that would ensure a more equitable academy for working mothers now and in the future. While the data are clear that mothers are being disproportionately impacted by COVID-19, many groups could benefit from these strategies. Rather than rebuilding what we once knew, let us be the architects of a new world.

Indexed as

COVID-19FemaleHumansMothersParentingResearch PersonnelSARS-CoV-2SexismTeaching

Identifiers

PMID33690708
PMCPMC7942998
OpenAlexW3133586281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.