Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33690699›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Infection prevention and control compliance among exposed healthcare workers in COVID-19 treatment centers in Ghana: A descriptive cross-sectional study.

Mary Eyram Ashinyo, Stephen Dajaan Dubik, Vida Duti, Kingsley Ebenezer Amegah, Anthony Ashinyo, Brian Adu Asare, Angela Ama Ackon, Samuel Kaba Akoriyea, Patrick Kuma-Aboagye

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
15.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 120 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mary Eyram AshinyoInstitutional Care Division, Ghana Health Service Headquarters, Accra, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0002-8493-9378
Stephen Dajaan DubikSchool of Allied Health Sciences, University for Development Studies, Tamale, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0001-9833-2676
Vida DutiIRC-Ghana, Cantonments, Accra, Ghana.
Kingsley Ebenezer AmegahDepartment of Health Information, Hohoe Municipal Hospital, Hohoe, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0002-5251-1166
Anthony AshinyoNational AIDS/STI Control Programme, Accra, Ghana.
Brian Adu AsareDirectorate of Pharmacy, Ministry of Health, Accra, Ghana.
Angela Ama AckonWorld Health Organisation, Ghana Country Office, Accra, Ghana.
Samuel Kaba AkoriyeaInstitutional Care Division, Ghana Health Service Headquarters, Accra, Ghana.
Patrick Kuma-AboagyeOffice of the Director-General, Ghana Health Service Headquarters, Accra, Ghana.
Ghana Health Service · GHMinistry of Health · GHUniversity for Development Studies · GH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compliance with infection prevention and control (IPC) protocols is critical in minimizing the risk of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) infection among healthcare workers. However, data on IPC compliance among healthcare workers in COVID-19 treatment centers are unknown in Ghana. This study aims to assess IPC compliance among healthcare workers in Ghana's COVID-19 treatment centers. The study was a secondary analysis of data, which was initially collected to determine the level of risk of COVID-19 virus infection among healthcare workers in Ghana. Quantitative data were conveniently collected using the WHO COVID-19 risk assessment tool. We analyzed the data using descriptive statistics and logistic regression analyses. We observed that IPC compliance during healthcare interactions was 88.4% for hand hygiene and 90.6% for Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) usage; IPC compliance while performing aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs), was 97.5% for hand hygiene and 97.5% for PPE usage. For hand hygiene during healthcare interactions, lower compliance was seen among nonclinical staff [OR (odds ratio): 0.43; 95% CI (Confidence interval): 0.21-0.89], and healthcare workers with secondary level qualification (OR: 0.24; 95% CI: 0.08-0.71). Midwives (OR: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.09-0.93) and Pharmacists (OR: 0.15; 95% CI: 0.02-0.92) compliance with hand hygiene was significantly lower than registered nurses. For PPE usage during healthcare interactions, lower compliance was seen among healthcare workers who were separated/divorced/widowed (OR: 0.08; 95% CI: 0.01-0.43), those with secondary level qualifications (OR 0.08; 95% CI 0.01-0.43), non-clinical staff (OR 0.16 95% CI 0.07-0.35), cleaners (OR: 0.16; 95% CI: 0.05-0.52), pharmacists (OR: 0.07; 95% CI: 0.01-0.49) and among healthcare workers who reported of insufficiency of PPEs (OR: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.14-0.77). Generally, healthcare workers' infection prevention and control compliance were high, but this compliance differs across the different groups of health professionals in the treatment centers. Ensuring an adequate supply of IPC logistics coupled with behavior change interventions and paying particular attention to nonclinical staff is critical in minimizing the risk of COVID-19 transmission in the treatment centers.

Indexed as

AdultCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Cross InfectionCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGhanaGuideline AdherenceHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelHumansInfection ControlInfectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-ProfessionalKnowledgeMalePandemics

Identifiers

PMID33690699
PMCPMC7943010
OpenAlexW3134479860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.